We will have a mirror site at http://nunezreport.wordpress.com in case we are censored, Please save the link

Tuesday, October 9, 2012



I am compelled by the Holy Spirit to send out an urgent message to all on our mailing list, and to friends and to bishops we have met all over the world.


For ten years I have been warning about a thousand fires coming to New York City. It will engulf the whole megaplex, including areas of New Jersey and Connecticut. Major cities all across America will experience riots and blazing fires—such as we saw in Watts, Los Angeles, years ago.

There will be riots and fires in cities worldwide. There will be looting—including Times Square, New York City. What we are experiencing now is not a recession, not even a depression. We are under God’s wrath. In Psalm 11 it is written,

“If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (v. 3).

God is judging the raging sins of America and the nations. He is destroying the secular foundations.

The prophet Jeremiah pleaded with wicked Israel, “God is fashioning a calamity against you and devising a plan against you. Oh, turn back each of you from your evil way, and reform your ways and deeds. But they will say, It’s hopeless! For we are going to follow our own plans, and each of us will act according to the stubbornness of his evil heart” (Jeremiah 18:11-12).

In Psalm 11:6, David warns, “Upon the wicked he will rain snares (coals of fire)…fire…burning wind…will be the portion of their cup.” Why? David answered, “Because the Lord is righteous” (v. 7). This is a righteous judgment—just as in the judgments of Sodom and in Noah’s generation.


First, I give you a practical word I received for my own direction. If possible lay in store a thirty-day supply of non-perishable food, toiletries and other essentials. In major cities, grocery stores are emptied in an hour at the sign of an impending disaster.

As for our spiritual reaction, we have but two options. This is outlined in Psalm 11. We “flee like a bird to a mountain.” Or, as David says, “He fixed his eyes on the Lord on his throne in heaven—his eyes beholding, his eyelids testing the sons of men” (v. 4). “In the Lord I take refuge” (v. 1).

I will say to my soul: No need to run...no need to hide. This is God’s righteous work. I will behold our Lord on his throne, with his eye of tender, loving kindness watching over every step I take—trusting that he will deliver his people even through floods, fires, calamities, tests, trials of all kinds.

Note: I do not know when these things will come to pass, but I know it is not far off. I have unburdened my soul to you. Do with the message as you choose.

God bless and keep you,

In Christ,


Prophecy of Severe Incurable Diseases Coming to The Earth

IMF sees 'alarmingly high' risk of fresh global slump

“Risks for recession in the advanced economies are alarmingly high,” said the Fund’s latest World Economic Outlook. “The intensity of the euro area crisis has not abated as assumed in previous projections.”

Spain’s economy is expected to contract by 1.5pc this year and 1.3pc next as austerity bites, pushing public debt to 97pc of GDP in 2013. The estimate was 84pc as recently as April, showing how quickly the debt dynamics have gone horribly wrong.

Italy will shrink by 2.3pc this year and 0.7pc next, pushing the debt ratio to an all-time high of 128pc. The report said fiscal austerity in Europewas doing more damage than “expected” .

The Fund said “weakness is spreading from the periphery to the whole of the euro area”, with even Germany buckling. The eurozone will shrink at a 0.7pc rate in the second half of this year before eking out growth of 0.2pc in 2013, but only if Europe delivers on a string of promises made over recent months.

Failure to act in time could lead to a full-blown crash, with contraction near 7pc next year in Southern Europe and a deep recession in the North. The IMF said Europe must stand behind a summit pledge in June to allow the European Stability Mechanism or bail-out fund to recapitalise crippled banks in Spain and other EMU states directly. This is deemed “critical to help break the adverse feedback loops between sovereigns and banks”. The AAA bloc of Germany, Finland, Holland, and Austria have reneged on the deal.

The Fund said the confidence boost from the European Central Bank’s bond purchase scheme (OMT) would fade unless the plan is activated “rapidly”. It warned that “rising social tensions and adjustment fatigue” in the South could reignite the crisis in any case.

Europe’s woes have combined with a credit cycle downturn in Asia and Latin America. Growth this year has been cut to 1.5pc in Brazil and 5.4pc in India, a far cry from boom rates of the BRICS heyday.

The IMF expects the US to muddle through with growth of 2.2pc this year and 2.1pc in 2013, but the US economy has been uncomfortably close to stall speed over recent months. The economy could tip into a nosedive if Congress does not reach a deal to stop automatic tax rises next year. “At the extreme, the fiscal cliff could result in a fiscal withdrawal of more than 4pc of GDP in 2013” it said.

The IMF said the US has to steer a narrow course, mapping out a “credible fiscal plan” to tame long-run entitlements without aborting the recovery altogether by tightening too hard. It expects US gross debt to reach 114pc of GDP next year, near levels accumulated during the Second World War.

China is expected to avoid a hard-landing and still has some scope to cushion any further shock with fiscal stimulus, but it cannot unleash another lending blitz akin to 2008-2009 “without creating large financial stability risks”.

In a parallel report, the World Bank trimmed its forecast for China to 7.7pc this year. It said ample liquidity over recent months had “reignited credit growth” and would power a rebound in 2013, but it also struck a note of caution. “China’s slowdown this year has been significant, and some fear it could still accelerate. Local governments’ ambitious investment plans could well face funding constraints, not least because governments are feeling the pinch of a cooling real estate market, which lowers land sales revenues.”

Gustavo Reis from Bank of America said both monetary and policy fiscal are too “tight”, while wage rises have eroded China’s competitiveness by 10pc over the last year. There is an outside risk of a “China shock” hitting the rest of the world, with implications for German exporters or iron-ore suppliers such as Brazil and Australia.

The World Bank said China may languish in the “middle-income trap” over coming decades as productivity growth slows unless it ditches its1980s growth model. The worries were echoed by Chinese think tank Strategy and Reform, which called on incoming leader Xi Jinping the grasp the nettle of reform .

“There is a potential crisis in China’s model of economic growth. The next decade might be the last opportunity for actively pursuing reform, and we should treasure this last chance. China is confronting a perilous jump, one that it can neither hide from nor avoid no matter what,” it said.

The Telegraph

Iran could have enough uranium for a nuke within 2 months

VIENNA (AP) — Iran now could produce enough weapons-grade uranium to arm a nuclear bomb within two to four months but would still face serious “engineering challenges” — and much longer delays — before it would be able to use the material in an atomic warhead, a respected US think tank said Monday.

While Iran denies any interest in possessing nuclear arms, the international community fears it may turn its peaceful uranium enrichment program toward weapons making — a concern that is growing as Tehran expands the number of machines it uses to enrich as well as its stockpile of enriched uranium. And as apprehension increases, so does anxiety that Israel will make good on threats to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities before that nation reaches the bomb-making threshold.

In a strident call for an internationally drawn “red line” on what he said was Iran’s move toward nuclear arms, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sept. 28 the world has until next summer at the latest to stop Tehran before it can build an atomic bomb. Flashing a diagram of a cartoon-like bomb before the UN General Assembly, he said Iran was ready to move to the “final stage” of making such a weapon by then.

For now, US military and intelligence officials say they don’t believe Iran’s leadership has made the decision to build a bomb, while also warning that the country is moving closer to the ability to do so.

The Institute for Science and International Security did not make a judgment on whether Iran plans to turn its enrichment capabilities toward weapons making. But in its report made available to The Associated Press ahead of publication Monday, it drew a clear distinction between Tehran’s ability to make the fissile core of warhead by producing 25 kilograms (55 pounds) weapons-grade uranium from its lower enriched stockpiles and the warhead itself.

“Despite work it may have done in the past,” Iran would need “many additional months to manufacture a nuclear device suitable for underground testing and even longer to make a reliable warhead for a ballistic missile,” the report said.

Additionally, ISIS — which often advises Congress and other branches of U.S. government on Iran’s nuclear program — said any attempt to “break out” into weapons-grade uranium enrichment would be quickly detected by the United States and the International Atomic Energy, which monitors Tehran’s known enrichment sites. With Washington likely to “respond forcefully to any “break-out” attempt, Iran is unlikely to take such a risk “during the next year or so,” said the report.

Still, the report suggested a narrowing window as Iran positions itself to increase enrichment.

Iran now has more than 10,000 centrifuges enriching uranium at its main plant at Natanz, about 225 kilometers (140 miles) southeast of Tehran, making low-level material. Additionally it has about 800 machines turning out 20-percent enriched uranium at Fordo, a bunkered structure fortified against air attack near the holy city of Qom, as well as about 2,000 more installed but not yet running.

Uranium enriched to 20 percent can be turned into weapons-grade material much more quickly than low-enriched uranium. If the centrifuges at Fordo that now are idle also start operating and are used to make 20 percent material, Iran — using its total enrichment output of low and higher grade uranium — could produce enough weapons grade uranium for a warhead within three or four weeks, said the summary.

Olli Heinonen, who stepped down as the IAEA’s deputy director general in charge of the Iran file in 2010, said the ISIS report contained “good and technically sound estimates.”

He said Fordo will nearly double its production capacity of 20 percent enriched uranium to up to 30 kilograms (more than 60 pounds) a month, if an when all machines there are operating.

Times of Israel

Arab Spring may turn into a Nuclear Winter

In an interview with US journalist Charles Rose broadcast on Thursday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov expressed dismay about the “Arab Spring” turning into a “Nuclear Winter”.

At the same time, Lavrov stressed the necessity of showing a “serious attitude” toward the fact that more countries are mulling maintaining national security by obtaining nuclear weapons.

“Threats and isolation only fuel similar moods in some countries,” Lavrov said.

Commenting on the Iranian nuclear program, he said that Moscow is concerned over Tehran’s attempts to develop nuclear weapons, something that Lavrov said is yet to be verified.

Voice of Russia

Eurozone gives Greece 10-day ultimatum

Eurozone finance ministers have given Greece 10 days to implement budget cuts in return for a delayed bailout tranche.

Merkel and Samaris met in Berlin in August (Photo: primeminister.gov.gr)
"We stressed that before the next disbursement Greece clearly and credibly should demonstrate its commitment to fully implement the programme ... by the 18 October at the latest," said Jean-Claude Juncker, chair of the eurozone finance ministers, on Monday (8 October).

He noted that most of the 89 "prior actions" - a list of budget cuts, privatisations, labour market and tax reforms agreed in March - had been agreed upon within the three-party coalition in Athens, but that no money could flow before everything is implemented.

The €31.5 billion tranche of bailout money has been delayed since June, awaiting a report by experts from the "troika" of international lenders - the EUuropean Commission, European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) - who are still in Athens trying to figure out how to plug the widening gap in Greek finances.

IMF chief Christine Lagarde, during the same press conference, also said that "more work needs to be done" and that "acting means acting, not just speaking."

She denied reports that the IMF was at odds with the EU over Greece's debt sustainability scenario, a projection underlying the €130 billion bailout agreed in March, which assumes that debt-to-GDP will fall to 120 percent by 2020.

"There are no figures yet, the troika has not finalised its report," Lagarde said.

In a separate report issued Monday, the IMF warned of a possible worsening of the euro-crisis amid "rising social tensions and adjustment fatigue" in the "periphery" - meaning countries such as Greece, Portugal and Spain where anti-austerity protests have intensified in recent weeks.

About 8,000 protesters took to the streets of Athens on Monday on the eve of a visit by German Chancellor Angela Merkel shouting "Merkel raus [out]" and "Angela, go home."

Some 7,000 policemen are to be deployed during her six-hour visit to the Greek capital, with large parts of the city closed to protesters.

Merkel is on her first visit since Greece went bankrupt in 2009 and had to ask for two consecutive bailouts. Her visit is designed to show support for centre-right Prime Minister Antonis Samaras as he struggles to implement further austerity measures.

Blamed for most of Greece's woes in Greek press, Merkel has softened her stance in recent months.

But her message is likely to be more of the same: no money until the troika says the austerity measures are being implemented properly.


Dragon Flood Revolutions Revisited

Joseph Herrin

Note: I was sick last week, which is unusual for me. Living alone, and somewhat isolated from society, I am not as exposed to illness as many others. It has been about 4-5 years since the last time I can remember being sick. I had intense abdominal pains for about 12 hours, with nausea and vomiting. For a number of days afterward I was very weak and did not have the strength to write, so I spent much of the time reading some of the material I have accumulated for this study.

I am very eager to bring this series to a conclusion, yet there is so much that could be shared that it is difficult to know how to proceed. I am going to set forth that information which I believe will benefit the saints in recognizing the depth of deception practiced in the world today that they might lay aside all naivete and illusions, and walk as children of the light in the midst of a dark and perverse generation. Some of this information may be presented out of a logical sequence, but when it is all taken in consideration together I trust that it will serve the purpose for which it is being shared.

Following is a video that a sister in Christ provided a link unto. It does a good job of exposing the deceit of current events, and America’s engagement in Middle East wars. Although it does not address all of the reasons war is being pursued in these nations, it reveals that the media portrayal of a war on terror, or coming to the defense of democratic freedom fighters, are merely convenient lies used to lull an easily deceived people back to sleep.

The last couple minutes of the video present the speaker’s view that the proper response is civil disobedience and armed resistance. This reveals the blindness of mankind. Even when they perceive a portion of the evil and deception by which American citizens are being manipulated, they do not perceive that armed conflict and civil unrest are also aims of the money powers. I shared the following with the sister in Christ who sent me the video.

As you stated, the speaker's conclusions are all wrong. Indeed, he is espousing precisely what the money powers desire. They want civil unrest and armed conflict so they can appear justified in implementing martial law, suspending the constitution, and violating all human rights.

As one considers that the money powers own the media, the American citizen must ask why the media has given so much attention to the Occupy Wall Street movement. OWS is antagonistic toward the money powers, the one percent at the top. Why give media time to attacks against Wall Street and the money powers? It is because the money powers behind Wall Street desire to foment class warfare. It will lead to a slaughter of the lower classes, for the money powers control all the military and police forces in the nation. It is a David versus Goliath scenario, except there is no David present in this story.


Revolutions Revisited

America’s history is replete with the myth of the “just war.” Every war America has entered into has been sold to the people as a righteous and rational response to provocations, as a defense of America’s sovereignty, or her freedoms, or as a benevolent decision to aid America’s allies, and to defend the oppressed. At no time has the American people been told the true reasons that her leaders have chosen a course of war. J.P. Morgan, one of the premier architects of American government control by the money powers, stated the following.

A man always has two reasons for what he does - a good one, and the real one.

Americans have been conned time and again into supporting foreign wars as her leaders have provided them with “good reasons” to do so. Yet, these same leaders have cunningly hid from the majority the “real reasons” that they were being led into war.

Ralph Epperson reveals in his book that there are two overriding motives that have guided a global elite as they have fomented wars among nations.

1. Wars are inherently expensive. Nations that go to war have to employ millions of their citizens that would normally be on someone else’s payroll. Also there is the vast war material, arms and munitions, that must be manufactured or purchased. These costs lead nations to borrow money to conduct their wars, and global bankers thereby gain power over nations. As the Bible declares, “The borrower is slave to the lender.”

2. Wars provide an unparalleled opportunity to bring about societal change. In America, war has been the tool used to strengthen the Executive Branch, and to destroy the balance of powers designed into the Constitution by the founding fathers. War has been a catalyst for the government to transform America from a capitalist to a socialist basis. War has been used to induce women to abandon the home and enter the workforce (one of the planks of Communism). In a myriad of ways, foundational societal change has been enacted through the imposition of wars upon the American public.

The true causes for wars are seldom discerned by mankind. Satan’s chief servants in this world are well trained in the manipulation of humanity, and in the employment of cunning and deception. International banking interests such as the House of Rothschild, and the Morgan and Rockefeller banks, have instigated wars on false pretenses in order to establish central banks in the various nations. Once the central banks are established, and under the control of the global bankers, wars between nations are contrived with the same banks financing both sides of the conflict and reaping massive wealth through the death and suffering of millions.

An example of the deception that has been successfully propagated regarding the causes of wars is observed in the French Revolution. The French Revolution followed immediately upon the conclusion of the American Revolution. One can argue convincingly that the same forces were at work in both, and that lessons learned in America were applied in France.

The common conception regarding the American Revolution is that a spontaneous, popular uprising of Colonial Americans erupted over the gross abuses of the King of England. As has been demonstrated in previous chapters, this is a fallacy. There were men of substance who were set to profit greatly by a break with England and an establishment of an American government. Rather than being a spontaneous uprising, the details of the Revolution were carefully plotted in lodges of Freemasonry in this country.

Even as it is suggested that the King of England’s oppression was the cause of the Revolution, so too has it been told that the French Revolution resulted from the oppression of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. Once again, a revolution has been painted as a popular uprising. Like America’s Boston Tea Party, France’s Revolution had its signature act, the storming of the Bastille.

It is commonly understood that a very impoverished and oppressed French people rose up en masse and stormed the Bastille, a French Prison and fortress, in order to free political prisoners. The truth is that the population of Paris at the time when this event took place was around 800,000, yet only 1,000 people took part in this uprising, and these were paid brigands from the south of France hired by the Duc d’Orleans (a Freemason and member of the Illuminati).

Nesta Webster in her book The French Revolution speaks of the experience of a Dr. Rigby who was in Paris at the time. Despite the images portrayed today of the entire city of Paris being up in arms, and great chaos ensuing, Dr. Rigby did not know that anything was even occurring that day. He was out touring the city, and in the afternoon visited the Gardens of Monceaux. Nor were the people of France oppressed and impoverished as a myriad of history books describe them to be. France was the most prosperous European state prior to the war. Ralph Epperson writes in The Unseen Hand that:

France held one-half of all of the money in circulation in all of Europe, and in the period of 1720-1780, foreign trade was multiplied by four. One half of the wealth in France was in the hands of the middle class, and the “serfs” owned more land than anyone else. The king had abolished forced labor on public works in France and had outlawed the use of torture in interrogation. In addition, the king had founded hospitals, established schools, reformed the laws, built canals, drained the marshes to increase the quantity of arable land, and had constructed numerous bridges to ease the flow of goods inside the country.

As Ralph Epperson points out in his book, the enemy of the money powers, is always the middle class. King Louis XVI had created an environment in France that was amenable to a great expansion of the middle class, and those behind the Revolution sought to prevent this from occurring.

Like the American Revolution, Freemasonry played a leading role in the Revolution in France. Epperson writes:

Freemasonry had come to France in 1725, but by 1772 the organization had split into two groups, one of which was known as Grand Orient Lodge of Freemasonry. The first Grand Master, the equivalent of president of the Lodge, was the Duc d’ Orleans, also a member of the Illuminati.

The Grand Orient Lodge spread quickly throughout the entirety of France so that by 1789 (the year of the French Revolution) there were 600 lodges all over France compared to only 104 in 1772. Members of the Grand Orient Lodge were also active in government, as 447 of the 605 members of the Estates General, France’s parliament, were members.

History books declare that the Bastille was a prison of torture used by King Louis XVI, and that it held hundreds of political prisoners. The story contends that a valiant uprising of oppressed citizens who had loved ones being held inside stormed the Bastille to set them free. This fable is on the par with that which suggests Colonialists dressed as Indians spontaneously came together to dump tea into Boston Harbor. Ralph Epperson cites Nesta Webster when he writes:

The plan of attack was to storm the Bastille, not to release hundreds of “oppressed political prisoners” supposedly imprisoned there, but to capture the needed weapons to start the revolution. This was confirmed by the fact that, when the mob reached the Bastille, so-called “torturous” prison of the “oppressive” King Louis XVI, there were only seven prisoners incarcerated there: four forgers, two lunatics, and the Comte de Solages, incarcerated for “monstrous crimes against humanity” at the request of his family. “The damp, dark dungeons had fallen into complete disuse; since the ministry of Necker in 1776 no one had been imprisoned there.

Storming of the Bastille

Do you detect propaganda in the image above? There are children in the front playing the drums. An attractive woman rallies the crowd, as a group of noble citizens attacks the fortress. You can sense in this portrait the French people’s zeal and noble motives to free their fellow citizens. A painting of a group of cutthroats hired by the Duc d’ Orleans storming a nearly empty prison to steal a cache of weapons would not produce quite the same effect.

Even as history has deceived following generations about the cause of the French Revolution, or the major players who precipitated it, so too were the citizens of France deceived and thereby brought to support the Revolution. There is no surer way to press a people into immediate action than to take away their supply of food. If one can then hide the truth of the shortage and persuade the populace that another is to blame, then the wrath of the masses can be channeled to accomplish ends they do not discern.

Wesbter says: “Montjoie asserts that agents employed by the Duc d’ Orleans deliberately bought up the grain, and either sent it out of the country or concealed it in order to drive the people to revolt.”

So the Duc’ d’ Orleans, a member of the Illuminati, purchased large quantities of grain to cause the people to take their grievances to the King whom they believed had caused the shortage. It was, of course, the Illuminati that spread the story that the King had intentionally caused the grain shortage.
[Source: The Unseen Hand, Ralph A. Epperson]

People of God, deception and lies have been the means by which Satan has fomented wars and revolutions for millennia. Even as the serpent lied in his first appearance in the Bible, and thereby induced Eve to perform a deed that was destructive to her own person and all her descendants, Satan continues to use lies and deception to lead the masses of mankind to actions injurious to their own selves.

History books similarly tell us that the Russian Revolution of 1917 was started by starving Russian workers who were being oppressed by Czar Nicholas II. The true cause of the Russian Revolution is one that is the source of many more recent wars. Oil!

John D. Rockefeller was an early refiner of oil in America. His aim was not simply to be a large and powerful refiner, nor even the largest and most powerful oil refiner. Rockefeller wanted to be the ONLY oil refiner in the world. In 1872 Rockefeller controlled twenty-five percent of America’s refining capacity. Just seven years later he controlled ninety-five percent. Having captured the American oil market with his Standard Oil business, Rockefeller then turned his attention to controlling the global supply. In 1879 Standard Oil was supplying ninety percent of America’s foreign oil sales, and had a dominant position in world oil sales.

Vast oil reserves were discovered in the Baku field on the Caspian Sea in Russia. By 1883 the Russians had built a railroad to this location, and they began ramping up production. In the year 1860 America’s petroleum output was 70,000 tons and Russia’s was 1,300 tons. America’s output was 53 times the volume of Russia. In 1885 America produced 3,120,000 tons of oil, and Russia 2,000,000. America’s margin had shrunk to 1.5 times that of the Russian production. In the year 1901 America produced 9,920,000 tons of oil and Russia 12,170,000. Russia had now exceeded the oil output of America, and this was accompanied by a great acceleration in Russia’s transformation from an agrarian society to an industrial one. From 1907 to 1913 Russia’s industrial growth outstripped that of both America and Germany. If continued to progress, Russia would have soon reached parity with these advanced industrial nations.

Although the Baku oil fields of Russia were financed by other global elites, primarily the Rothschilds and the Nobel family, it was soon realized that competition was destroying the profitability of the oil business. Texe Marrs has an article posted on the subject from which the following quotation is taken.

At the turn of the 20th century the world’s #1 oil producing field was in the prosperous port city of Baku, in Azerbaijan. The famous Nobel brothers of Sweden launched the Baku oil boom in 1873. Soon huge oil tankers from that region were traversing the globe.

Then, in 1883, oil companies owned by the Rothschild family entered the scene in Baku followed by Rockefeller’s gigantic Standard Oil Company. Heated competition was on for control of the world’s top producing region.

Oil derricks sprouted up everywhere in Baku, Azerbaijan. The fields were the largest in the world at the time. At the time, Rockefeller and Rothschild were competing as the world’s foremost oil and banking barons. But the two competitors each finally realized that competition was not a good thing. The more oil wells they drilled, the more oil was produced, the more the price of oil per barrel fell. This led a disgruntled John D. Rockefeller to exclaim, “Competition is a sin!”

A solution, therefore, was soon brokered. It was decided that the world’s markets would geographically be carved up, with the two barons, Rockefeller and Rothschild, each having their separate, well-defined shares. Moreover, limits would be put on oil produced globally so as to keep the market price as high as possible. Under this arrangement, both Rothschild and Rockefeller would benefit.

Of course, all other competition would be squelched, driven out of business, including the Nobel Oil Company in Baku.

The next course of action was that the Rockefeller-Rothschild cartel and their banker associates (Schiff, Warburg, Morgan, et al) proceeded to fund and sponsor the Bolshevik Communist revolution of 1917. Their puppets, Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin, soon reigned over the vast Soviet Russia empire.

In April of 1920, Lenin, following orders from the Rockefeller-Rothschild cartel, went into action in Baku. Bolshevik troops and irregulars attacked and conquered the country of Azerbaijan and launched an all-out assault on Baku. Hundreds of thousands of residents were slaughtered, especially the families of the oil company executives, engineers, and chief workers. Their luxurious mansions and homes were plundered, wives and children raped, tortured and murdered. Then the oil derricks and facilities of Baku were set on fire—torched.

Whoosh! Instantly, one of the world’s top oil producing regions was no more. The Nobel brothers fled for their lives back to Sweden, suffering a huge financial loss. Naturally, the Baku oil assets of Rothschild and Rockefeller were lost as well, but this was according to plan. That plan dictated that Russia would, during the Communist era, not be a world player in oil.

This closing of Baku immediately resulted in an astronomical increase in the global price of oil. Rockefeller and Rothschild were well compensated for the temporary loss of their Baku assets. “Creative Destruction” had brought fabulous riches to these two corrupt Illuminati dynasties.
[Source: http://www.texemarrs.com/082010/baku_oil_fields.htm]

Those who want to rule the world cannot permit anyone else to threaten their position. Russia’s success in expanding oil production, and her rapid industrialization, had made her an enemy of American robber barons and European bankers. Adding to Russia’s troubles, after Russia defeated Napoleon and occupied Paris in 1814, nearly a hundred years earlier, many Russian aristocrats visited France. Some were introduced to Freemasonry and brought it back to Russia where two lodges were formed in secrecy, the Northern Star, and the Southern Star. These organizations played a key role in working for revolution in Russia.

Those who want to rule the world cannot permit anyone else to threaten their position. Russia’s success in expanding oil production, and her rapid industrialization, had made her an enemy of American robber barons. Adding to Russia’s troubles, after Russia defeated Napoleon and occupied Paris in 1814, nearly a hundred years earlier, many Russian aristocrats visited France. Some were introduced to Freemasonry and brought it back to Russia where two lodges were formed in secrecy, the Northern Star, and the Southern Star. These organizations played a key role in working for revolution in Russia.

To weaken Russia financially and militarily, the American capitalists decided to finance the Japanese government in a war with the Russian government. Ralph Epperson writes:

From New York, Jacob Schiff, J.P. Morgan, the First National Bank, and the National City Bank loaned Japan approximately $30,000,000 to attack the Russian government from the east.

During the time period of 1905 until 1917 Lenin, Trotsky and other communist leaders plotting the overthrow of the Russian monarchy were receiving tremendous support from American capitalists. After the Czar abdicated the throne in 1917 and an interim government was established, the exiled communist leaders were able to return to Russia. Trotsky left New York City, the center of America’s banking interests, on March 27, 1917 to return to Russia after passing through Canada. Trotsky and the 275 followers who were with him were stopped by the Canadian government in Halifax, Nova Scotia. It was found that Trotsky had a large sum of money on his person. The Canadians contacted the American government who pressed them to release Trotsky and his followers. Accompanying Trotsky was Charles Crane of the Westinghouse Company, and Chairman of the Democratic Finance Committee.

When a Senate investigating committee looked into this matter, Congressman Louis McFadden stated, “They (the private banking monopolies) financed Trotsky’s mass meetings of rebellion and discontent in New York. They paid Trotsky’s passage from New York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian Revolution and they placed a large fund of American dollars at Trotsky’s disposal in one of their branch banks in Sweden.”

Congressman Louis McFadden was an outspoken critic of the banking cartel, and the Federal Reserve. He survived two assassination attempts, only to die in a third attempt when he was poisoned at a banquet.

The American government at every turn has worked to establish and expand Communism throughout the world. In 1919 the Japanese government sought America’s approval for Japan to enter the war against the Bolsheviks (Communists) in Russia. President Woodrow Wilson refused Japan’s request. Japan’s entry into war against the Bolsheviks would have put enormous stress upon the Communists who were seeking to establish control of Russia.

Although many history books describe the Russian Revolution of 1917 as a popular uprising of the lower classes against the monarchy, and it is understood that the majority of Russians were in favor of the new Communist government. This is not true. In 1917 as an interim government was in place, an election was held to see whether the Russian people would choose Communism. Trotsky pushed for the election for he was confident that the Bolsheviks would come out on top. Forty-two million votes were cast in Russia, and only thirty percent went to the Bolsheviks. Seventy percent of the Russian people rejected the new Communist party to be rulers of their nation. The Bolsheviks then pressed forth with a war on their own people to stamp out all opposition. It would be a couple decades later before their rule was solidified and uncontested.

American bankers and industrialists played a key part in establishing the Communist government in Russia. In truth, Americans are more responsible for Communism in Russia than the Russian people themselves. Yet Satan has deluded the masses to believe that America has been antagonistic toward Communism from the beginning. The facts prove otherwise.

The director of the Federal Reserve bank of New York, William B. Thompson, gave a personal contribution of $1,000,000 to the Bolsheviks. Mr. Thompson was also a heavy stockholder in the Chase National Bank, owned by the Rockefeller interests.

The Morgan and Rockefeller interests also contributed cash to the cause, as did Jacob Schiff, the senior partner of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., who gave Lenin $20,000,000. Schiff was a partner of Paul Warburg, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and a participant of the Jekyll Island, Georgia meetings that wrote the Federal Reserve bill that created America’s central banking system.
[Source: The Unseen Hand, Ralph A. Epperson]

The Bolsheviks brutally enforced their rule over the Russian people. In the Ukraine they starved the population into submission. The Bolsheviks removed the farmers from their fields and confiscated their crops. Millions of Russian peasants were starving across the nation. The Bolsehviks themselves were endangered by their own policies.

This time it was Herbert Hoover who “saved Lenin’s dictatorship from popular revolt in the early 1920s. There is further proof that Hoover, then President Harding’s Secretary of Commerce, knew U.S. shipments of food, which the American people were told were to save starving Russians, actually were used to strengthen Bolshevik power. In his book “Herbert Hoover and Famine Relief to Soviet Russia,” professor Benjamin Weissman of Rutger’s University revealed that Hoover continued to send public foodstuffs to Russia long after it was obvious the Bolsheviks were shipping their own food abroad in order to purchase machinery.
[Source: Ibid]

Why would American capitalists, bankers, and the American government support the founding of a Communist government whose principles were antithetical to America’s capitalist system? As it will be demonstrated as this series continues, Communism is the system chosen by the Illuminati for their one world government. When the New World Order is revealed, it will be Communist in nature. As Ralph Epperson explains in his book The Unseen Hand, there are two primary methods by which the Illuminati seeks to bring all nations under a Communist system. There is the violent method as was successfully used to establish Communism in Russia. Then there is the non-violent method that is being used in the nations of Western Europe, America, and elsewhere.

Although the American government under the control of the money powers promotes an image of being anti-Communist, they are actually working steadily and progressively to transf0rm the nation into a Socialist system. In the past five years progress has been exceptionally rapid in transforming America into a socialist country. A huge centralized Federal government is now in place that controls all the factors of society. The middle class in America is rapidly shrinking, and the government owns or controls the majority of property in the nation. Consider that a full third of the land area of America is now owned outright as Federal property. Add in the tens of millions of mortgages that have been underwritten by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the purchase of billions of dollars of mortgage securities by the Federal Reserve (supposedly to stabilize the banks and the economy), and it is evident that America is no longer owned by the citizens of the nation. It is owned by the government.

In order for all nations to come under one single world governmental system, they must all share the same form of government. It is not possible to have a one world government while some areas of the globe operate upon capitalist and free market principles and others upon Communist/Socialist principles. All must be the same. It is evident that Communism has been chosen as the authoritarian, highly controlled, centrally planned, form of government for the world. This is what Satan calls “Freedom” for mankind, and this is what his disciples also call Freedom.

This is why the powers that truly rule in America have been propping up Communist countries for generations. This is why Russia, who was America’s ally in World War II was given a free hand to expand her governmental control over all of Eastern Europe. In truth, one of the primary goals of World War II was to spread Communism further across the globe. Evidence will be provided of this fact, and American involvement in this plan, in the following chapters.

Joseph Herrin

Swiss Army is preparing for unrest in Europe

The Swiss Army expects a dramatic escalation of the situation in States with EU crisis impact on the security of Switzerland. This tells the Swiss newspaper on Sunday. The reason: Due to multiple austerity measures weaken the armies in the southern euro-zone countries. This modernization of the neighboring armies fall by the wayside.This would weaken the armies, the European states are vulnerable to blackmail. The Swiss Defence Minister Ueli Maurer said, according to the Sunday at a meeting: "I do not exclude that in the coming years need the army."

The Defense Department VBS tells mason views. The euro crisis exacerbates the potential for violence. In Spain, Greece and Italy are threatening mass unemployment and the radicalization of the population. Thus referred to warnings of the Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras.

Because Switzerland is afraid of possible unrest from spreading to its territory, will be upgraded: 100,000 soldiers, 5 billion military budget and the Gripen fighter jet is scheduled to defend the Confederates. Against potential riots, demonstrations and refugees from the surrounding neighboring countries in Europe, the 2000 senior officers have with the maneuver "Stabilo Due" taken precautions before. Is planning army chief André Blattmann four military police battalions and a total of 1600 men secure the four parts of the country at the border.


North Korea warns US on missiles after South deal

North Korea missile ranges map

North Korea says it has missiles that can hit the US mainland, in a statement two days after South Korea unveiled a missile deal with the US.

The statement said US bases in "Japan, Guam and the US mainland" were within its "scope of strike".

It follows Seoul's announcement on Sunday that it would almost triple the range of its own missile system.

Pyongyang is thought to be working on a long-range missile, but two recent rocket tests ended in failure.

North Korea's neighbours said the failed rocket launches - in April 2009 and April 2012 - were tests related to the development of the long-range Taepodong-2 missile system.

The system, which analysts believe is intended to put the US mainland within striking range, has not yet been tested successfully.

North Korea routinely issues strong rhetoric against Seoul and Washington.

But the Communist state does possess an array of short- and medium-range missiles, as well as artillery pointed towards South Korea, says the BBC's Kevin Kim in Seoul.

The statement, carried by state-run KCNA news agency and attributed to North Korea's National Defence Commission, said Pyongyang would match any enemy "nuclear for nuclear, missile for missile".

It added that the missile deal between the US and South Korea was "another conspiracy of the master and the stooge to push the situation on the Korean Peninsula to the extreme... and ignite a war".

On Sunday, South Korea announced it had reached an agreement with the US on extending the range of its ballistic missiles.

Under a previous security deal with the US, it had been restricted to missiles with a range of 300km (186 miles). The new deal extends that range to 800km.

National Security Adviser Chun Yung-woo said the aim was to curb "military provocations by North Korea".

The two Koreas remain technically at war following the 1950-53 Korean War, which ended in an armistice.

The US has more than 28,000 troops in South Korea and provides security guarantees for its ally.


Last night, another round of geomagnetic storms broke out as Earth passed through the wake of a CME that hit during the early hours of Oct. 8th. Reports of auroras were received from across Canada and all the northern-tier US states. This was the view from Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta:

"The auroras outside of Edmonton were so bright that, for a while, it was easy to walk around in the field I was standing in," says photographer Beth Allan. "The lights moved so fast and were so crisp that it felt like I could reach out and touch them. Really astounding!"

High-latitude sky watchers should remain alert for auroras as Earth's magnetic field continues to reverberate from the Oct. 8th CME strike

Space weather


TEL AVIV – President Bashar al-Assad of Syria held a meeting today with his regime’s army leadership to discuss the possibility of a full general military mobilization to face the prospect of war with Turkey, according to a senior Syrian official speaking to WND.

The official said no decision has been taken about whether to mobilize all branches or to call up the reserves, citing an argument at the meeting that Syria doesn’t want to be seen as taking the first major step toward war.

According to Middle East security officials, Assad’s regime may have another reason for delaying the callup of reserves. The Syrian leader, they say, fears a full-scale reserve callup may result in an embarrassingly large number of troops refusing to serve.

The officials said that while Assad can depend on Shiite, Druze and Christian reserves, there is concern of large scale refusal among the Sunni population. The majority of the Syrian military is Sunni, while most of the military leadership comes from Assad’s Alawite religious group.

Already last month, Syria called up some reserves with many reportedly failing to show up for duty.

The information came as Turkey and Syria traded artillery fire today for the sixth consecutive day.

Turkey reportedly bombarded Syrian army positions in response to what Turkish officials said was a new shell strike on a border town.

The exchanges came hours after U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon earlier today called the escalating conflict on the Syrian-Turkish “extremely dangerous” and made a strong appeal for countries to stop the flow of arms into the region.

Speaking at an international conference on democracy in Strasbourg, Ban said the escalating tensions along the Turkey-Syria border could have serious implications for the region.

He said the internal situation in Syria had “dramatically worsened” and was causing “serious risks to the stability of Syria’s neighbors and the entire region.”