We will have a mirror site at http://nunezreport.wordpress.com in case we are censored, Please save the link

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

U.S. Marine Combat Veteran banned from daughter’s graduation because he exposed to the media the school’s program of Islamic indoctrination


john_wood-with-daughterA U.S. Marine veteran has gone to court asking a judge to overturn a school’s decision to banish him from a public school campus in Maryland because he objected to the Islam indoctrination to which his daughter was subjected. The fight has been going on since 2014, but John Kevin Wood said the issue has become urgent because this is his daughter’s last semester and he doesn’t want to be deprived of the opportunity to be at her graduation events and ceremony.


WND (h/t Mike F)   The Thomas More Law Center said on Monday it filed a motion for a preliminary injunction that would overturn the school’s ban. (Thomas More Law is the leader in winning these kinds of cases and usually do them pro bono)

The motion for the preliminary injunction that would block the school’s ongoing banishment explains the school deprived Wood of meaningful involvement in the direction of his daughter’s education because the no-trespass order prevented him from speaking at parent meeting in violation of the First Amendment.


The district, the Charles County Public Schools in La Plata, Maryland, also deprived Wood of his constitutional rights “by giving a principal unfettered discretion to ban him – the father of a student – from school grounds without any hearing or opportunity to defend himself because he brought to light the school’s unconstitutional practices.

WND reported only two weeks ago that the Thomas More Law Center had filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against the school, Principal Evelyn Arnold and Vice Principal Shannon Morris. District officials told WND Arnold and Morris would not be commenting.

The plaintiffs are Marine Corps veteran John Kevin Wood and his wife, Melissa, who “refuse[d] to allow their teenage daughter to be subjected to Islamic indoctrination and propaganda in her high school world history class.”

U.S. Marine veteran John Kevin Wood and his wife, Melissa
U.S. Marine veteran John Kevin Wood and his wife, Melissa

The lawsuit charged that the defendants’ “curriculum, practices, policies, actions, procedures, and customs promote the Islamic faith by requiring students to profess the five pillars if Islam.” The students, the complaint says, were required to “write out and confess the shahada, the Islamic profession of faith.”

The lawsuit charges that school officials concealed the curriculum by using two separate history textbooks, one of which contained the Islamic teachings and which students were required to leave at school. The other, which did not contain the teachings, was allowed to be taken home, the complaint explains. The school also excised the Islamic teachings from the course syllabus.


“Defendants have treated plaintiffs’ Christian beliefs and heritage with deliberate indifference, and have been hostile toward C.W. [the student] and her family,” the complaint alleges. It explains that Arnold and Morris violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments as well as state and federal law by “depriving plaintiffs and C.W. of their fundamental right to be free from a public school’s promotion of certain religious beliefs, their fundamental right to be able to speak freely and raise concerns about religion being taught in our public schools without retaliation, and their fundamental right to be free from unjust discrimination against their Christian heritage.”

The legal team notes the shahada states, “There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” “For non-Muslims, reciting the statement is sufficient to convert one to Islam,” the complaint says. “Moreover, the second part of the statement, ‘Muhammad is the messenger of Allah,’ signifies the person has accepted Muhammad as their spiritual leader. The teenager was also required to memorize and recite the Five Pillars of Islam.”


Not only did the district refuse permission for C.W. to opt out of the religious assignments, it imposed grades of zero. Further, the complaint says, the district disparaged Christianity in multiple ways, including the statement, “Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian.” The district taught that the West engages in “imperialistic pursuits” and insists “men are the managers of women.”

It also taught: “To Muslims, Allah is the same god that is worshipped in Christianity and Judaism.” The district’s teachings specified that the Quran “is the word of Allah,” while Jews and Christians “believe the Torah and the Gospels were revealed to Moses and the New Testament writers.”

“The sugarcoated version of Islam taught at La Plata High School did not mention that the Quran explicitly instructs Muslims ‘to kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.’ (Sura 9-5),” the complaint says.


Wood objected and the school responded with its banishment order. The Law Center said it asked District Court Judge George J. Hazel to overturn the banishment order against Wood. The law center argues that many time courts considering “the same or comparable issues” have ruled such banishments violate due process as well as the First Amendment.

“It is necessary for this court to restrict defendants’ abuse of power that is contrary to the proper functioning of our country and the proper education of our children,” the team of lawyers argued. “The public’s interest in safeguard free speech favors granting injunctive relief.” The status quo, with the school’s banishment in place, will cause Wood to be “irreparably harmed.”

Some schools take students to mosque where they are forced to pray as Muslims do
Some public schools take students to mosque where they are forced to pray as Muslims do

“Defendants’ no-trespass order deprives Mr. Wood of his fundamental right to free speech guaranteed and protected by the Constitution,” a brief filed in support of the request said.

The TMLC explained, “In a phone call on the morning of October 24, 2014, John Kevin Wood advised the vice principal that the Constitution forbids the school from instructing his daughter in Islam or forcing her to disparage and denigrate her Christian faith; he reiterated his previous day’s request that she be given an alternative assignment, which was again refused.

“He then threatened to contact the media and lawyers if the school insisted on violating the Constitution. However, the school was adamant and, as a result, his daughter suffered failing grades for not completing the pro-Islam assignments. Later that day, John Kevin Wood was notified by a police officer of the no-trespass order.”


Arnold claimed in the order that he “made verbal threats against the school” and those “actions” were a “safety threat.”

There was no provision for any appeal, hearing or explanation from the school on what officials thought to be threats since the only threat was to notify the media and contact lawyers, the brief explains. The school, the lawyers wrote, denied Wood “any opportunity to be heard at all because he espoused a Christian message and disagreed with defendants’ Islamic indoctrination of his daughter.”

“Here, defendants Arnold and Morris banned Mr. Woods from the grounds of his daughter’s school because they disagreed with his viewpoint that his daughter should receive alternative assignments to defendants’ unconstitutional promotion of Islam. … Their disagreement with Mr. Wood’s message is the sold reason for the no-trespass order.”

Wood was deployed in Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm “and lost friends to Islamic extremists,” the complaint notes. Later, he “responded as a firefighter to the 9/11 Islamic terror attack on the Pentagon.” “Wood witnessed firsthand the destruction created in the name of Allah and knows that Islam is not ‘a religion of peace.’ 

The school prevented John Kevin Wood from defending his daughter’s Christian beliefs against Islamic indoctrination, even though as a Marine, he stood in harm’s way to defend our nation, and the Charles County Public Schools,” the lawsuit says.

Islamic Indoctrination is in American public schools as part of Common Core which is funded by the Islamic nation of Qatar
Islamic Indoctrination is in American public schools as part of Common Core which is funded by the Islamic nation of Qatar

VIDEO below is from Nov. 2014 when the story first hit the media:

Credit to Bare Naked Islam

Google's "SkyNet" Robots Are All Grown Up, And Terrifying

Image result for boston dynamics logo

The last time we looked at the fascinating robotic products of Boston Dynamics, a company which Google prudently acquired quietly in 2013, it was a cute petting zoo of clumsy robotic "animals" including a "big dog", a "wild cat", and a "cheetah." They could barely walk for a few minutes without collapsing or suffering some terminal failure.

Barely over two years later Google's robots, no longer cute little animals, are not only all grown up but judging by the progress revealed in the company's latest progress video, are a few months from being full 5'9", 180 lbs humanoid automatons who can not only walk, pick themselves up, open doors, and carry heavy loads, but are this close from replacing millions of workers in menial, repetitive occupations as well as forming an army of robots best seen until recently in the science fiction section of your favorite streaming movie provider. 
Worse, they are downright terrifying because after watching the clip below we can't decide which flashbacks are stronger: to SkyNet or RoboCop.
This is how Boston Dynamics intros the following disturbing video:
A new version of Atlas, designed to operate outdoors and inside buildings. It is specialized for mobile manipulation. It is electrically powered and hydraulically actuated. It uses sensors in its body and legs to balance and LIDAR and stereo sensors in its head to avoid obstacles, assess the terrain, help with navigation and manipulate objects. This version of Atlas is about 5' 9" tall (about a head shorter than the DRC Atlas) and weighs 180 lbs.
In other words the "Atlas" is cheaper, faster, more efficient, and never complaining version of you, and will soon come in "battalion" and "mechanized infantry" versions.

Credit to Zero Hedge


Will a Second Military Coup Finally Unseat Obama?

In the world of an “Et tu Brute” coup against the established political leadership, there are two separate and distinct kinds of coup. First, there is the coup of opportunity. The coup of opportunity occurs, as luck would have it, when circumstances present an opportunity for the military force a change in leadership. the second kind of coup involves a general discontent among military leadership along with allies within the government and this kind of coup almost always has the backing of the majority of the citizenry.

A Coup of Opportunity

clinton and stevensA distinct coup of opportunity took place during the establishment’s “stand down” position while Ambassador Stevens and his security fought for their lives at Benghazi. The attack on Benghazi took place at a time when Obama was changing military commanders faster than most people change their socks. Under Obama, nobody in the military could have felt secure in their positions. The military had come to see how they had been sold out by Obama and American military lives were at risk. For that matter, the entire country was at risk under Obama’s leadership.
As a prelude to the attack on Benghazi, Stevens had been trafficking in guns, drugs and children on behalf of the CIA for the express purpose of raising funds, Iran-Contra style, for Middle East Terrorist groups. These facts were leaking out and 2012, was an election year and the leak had to be plugged. Stevens knew he was in danger as his requests for a stronger body guard contingent went ignored by his boss at the time, Hillary Clinton. I subsequently learned that Stevens reached out to the military command structure in the area and asked for help in the event he was attacked. The traditional American military was all too happy to help because Stevens could have brought down the Obama administration in a post-rescue scenario as he would have sung like a canary as to the kinds of criminal activities that the administration was engaged in.
The two military who were going to rescue Stevens and change the course of military history were AFRICOM’s commanding officer, General Carter Ham, and Carrier task force commander, Admiral Charles M. Gayouette.
The positions held by Hamm and Gayouette are so powerful and so sensitive, their replacements requireed approval from the Senate.
Both leaders were jointly attempting to rescue Ambassador Stevens and his bodyguards, despite being told to stand down by Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta. There is now  proof that Obama was warned in advance of the coming attack in which Stevens begged for more protection and his impassioned plea was denied by Clinton.
As Stevens was begging for help after the attack had begun, General Hamm had activated a special forces team within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house, was under attack. When General Ham received his “stand down” orders from Obama, he made plans to go ahead with the rescue and was arrested within minutes of contravening he order by his second in command, General Rodriquez, of the CIA. Admiral Gayouette, the commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and air cover for General Hamm’s rescue team in violation of his standing orders and he was promptly relieved of command for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.” 
General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya. And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders.
It is abundantly clear that had Obama been concerned for saving the lives of the four murdered Americans, American forces could have stopped the mortar fire that eventually killed Ambassador Stevens. However, Panetta and Obama blocked any rescue attempt. In legal parlance, Obama, Panetta and Clinton were, at minimum, accomplices to murder.
I was given this information in September of 2012 and told to publish these accounts. I hesitated for a couple of weeks because I did not feel that I had enough supporting information. I was repeatedly told to throw caution to the wind and publish this story. I was further told that I would be vindicated when the inevitable Congressional investigation would take place. This, indeed, ended up being the case.
As I look back on the Benghazi days, it is clear that even though the coup failed to produce its final and desired result, a message had been sent to and among key military leaders that there was a military contingent that was not going to capitulate to the illegal alien occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Boulevard.
The Benghazi affair was a failed coup of opportunity.

A Planned Military Coup

seven days in mayA planned coup, as opposed to a coup of opportunity, requires elaborate and secret planning. The element of surprise is essential in this type of coup. The 1960’s movie, The Seven Days in May, starring Burt Lancaster and Kirk Douglas captured many of these elements.
The one essential element that was missing from the aforementioned movie was that every successful coup of this type requires the eventual support of the people. The coup of opportunity at Benghazi required no such public approval. The scandal, as revealed by Stevens, would have produced the desired political change.
In the aftermath of Benghazi, and out of ignorance, I asked my insider source if there was going to be a coup anytime soon, as I lamented how close the country came to ridding itself of its biggest threat. I was told in unequivocal terms, that the dumbed down status of the American prevented any such planned coup from transpiring and that another coup of opportunity would have to present itself before there could be another attempt.

Another Coup of Opportunity

From both the circumstantial evidence and recent events, there may very well be another a coup of opportunity.
It is being widely reported that U.S. General Joseph Dunford ordered the President to steer clear of Scalia’s funeral following a conversation that Dunford had with Russian Colonel General Bondarev in which he was asked why Obama had attended a secret meeting with Scalia shortly before his death and had wondered out loud why Scalia did not have an autopsy. This information has been widely circulated and surprisingly, it is not getting the traction that it should be getting.
Scalia, as the leader of the conservative element of the Supreme Court, was Obama’s biggest obstacle with regard to Obama fulfilling his prime directive as President, namely, to install a rigid cap and trade system which would permanently destroy the economic backbone of the country. It has also been determined that Scalia had a secret meeting, that has leaked out with Obama shortly before his death but after the Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, struck down Obama’s key Climate Change initiatives. I am not privy to what Obama told Scalia, but I think it is safe to say they were not booking tee times on the golf course.
The feud between Obama and Scalia led to the following statements made by Scalia about the possibility of Obama taking retribution against Scalia. In 2012, in Fox news interview, Scalia publicly refuted the notion that Obama would retaliate against him for his rulings which ran in the face of the Obama administration.

This was a very telling interview and one can see how Scalia totally underestimated Obama’s potential for retribution. Add to these facts, the information that Scalia was was found with a pillow case on his face is mind-boggling. This was a message killing. However, as I have been told, the message to all is that nobody is safe from the despot-in-chief and subsequently, some feel they have little to lose with regard to acting against this President.

A Constitutional Crisis Could Force Obama Out Of White House

In the recent interview with Trunews, retired U.S. Air Force Lt. General Thomas McInerney and Retired U.S. Army General Paul Vallely talked seriously about the possibility of a “Constitutional crisis” that could occur at the hands of President Barack Obama. This was the proverbial “pillow case” over Obama’s face. It is not a physical threat, but it certainly is a political threat. “According to the report General Dunford lashed out at Bondarev claiming “of course the bastard [Obama] murdered him“.


My source has told me that Obama will not take the fall for the assassination of Scalia as he was too well insulated. However, as Commander-In-Chief, Obama has a fiduciary duty to protect the American people from foreign and domestic enemies. The failure to do could result in a potential reality if Obama refuses to protect the American people from the threat of ISIS and other known terror groups. To date, Obama has refused to even acknowledge Muslim extremism as a threat. And Obama has appointed several members to his administration who have active ties to the terrorist group known as the Muslim Brotherhood. This cannot be setting well with the military as we have troops fighting and dying in Afghanistan against these same types of people.
Don’t make the mistake of thinking that Obama does not have a contingency plan, he does. The multitude of foreign troops on our soil is a presidential insurance policy. Further, UWEX 16, the ongoing civil was drill going on in Texas speaks to what Obama is expecting to come his way.

Credit to Common Sense

Donate to The Common Sense Show


Iraqi Christians are fleeing their homes in fear of being killed

Image result for Iraqi Christians are fleeing their homes in fear of being killed

According to Ira
qi officials, at least 900 Christian families have fled their homes, frightened by a series of killings by Muslim extremists and threats to convert to Islam or face death. The main focus of this persecution of Iraqi Christians is in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. The Iraqi Defense Minister has ordered more checkpoints in Christian neighborhoods, with additional security patrols and more aerial surveillance of Christian areas.

Iraqi officials say Iraqi security services and armed forces must protect the Christians because they are partners in the rebuilding of the war-torn nation of Iraq.

The killing of Christians in Iraq today is a precursor to the fulfillment of Bible prophecy in the future.

There have been reports of Christians being killed in Iraq since the days of Saddam Hussein. In fact, Hussein ordered the killings of thousands of Christians under his leadership. Since the fall of Saddam and the beginning of the insurgency, the Islamic struggle to take over Iraq, there has been an increase in the killings of Christians. This report indicates that even the present Iraqi leadership recognizes what is happening in Iraq's Christian community.

Bible prophecy predicts a time when believers in Jesus Christ will be killed in Iraq. Revelation 18 reveals that Iraq, (biblical Babylon), will be the economic, political, governmental center of the earth. Revelation 13 speaks of the world leader at that time, the Antichrist, forcing people to take a mark in their forehead or the back of their right hand in order to be able to buy and sell the necessities of life. Believers in Christ who refuse to take the mark will be killed, (Revelation 6:9, 20:4). This will happen during the reign of the Antichrist in Babylon.

Threats against Iraqi Christians and the slaughter of these believers in Christ today is evidence that Bible prophecy will be fulfilled.

Credit to Jimmy DeYoung

Michael Snyder-Real Economic Activity Grinding To a Halt

US Military Delivers 5000 TONS Of Ammunition To Germany For “Training Exercises”

Image result for german flag

The news media says this is for “training purposes,” but I highly doubt it. Especially in light of the Muslim chaos in Germany and the US’ threats directed against Russia.
The real question to ask is “Are those round FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) or JHP (Jacketed Hollow Point)?” Because if the answer is JHP, then you know that it’s NOT being used for training, because that kind of ammunition is make for killing animals and people.
Via NBC News:
More than 5,000 tons of U.S. Army Europe ammunition arrived at a port in Germany last week — the largest single Europe-bound shipment in more than a decade.
Some 415 containers, with a variety of small arms, combat vehicle ammunition, artillery rounds and similar munitions, were loaded onto trains at the north Germany port of Nordenham and taken to a U.S. Army depot in Miesau, where they were being sorted Monday and readied for distribution.
The “critical shipment” comes amid a re-aligning of NATO forces along the alliance’ eastern flank and recent talk of a “new Cold War” between Russia and the West.
Forces will already rely on the new stockpile during an upcoming U.S. Army Europe training exercise, Anakonda 2016, which will take place in Poland in June and will involve 20,000 multinational troops.
Officials say that the maintaining of large stockpiles of weapons’ ammunition in Germany “allows U.S. and NATO forces to quickly access ammunition and other supplies for short notice NATO operations.”
Credit to Shoebat.com