The Chinese Military Will Be Knocking At Your Door

The Chinese military, they are here on our soil because they care.

 We already know that the United Nations is preparing to seize your guns. Will the Chinese military be the vanguard force in the effort to seize American guns? A very simple dot connecting exercise would suggest that will be the case.

Foreign Led Gun Confiscation of American Guns

Foreign troops could soon be going door-to-door, inside the United States, in order to seize legally owned American guns whose gun owners are presumably protected under the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Why would Obama sanction foreign troops to carry out such a task? Because Obama knows that he cannot totally trust the military to seize American guns.

My sources tell me that the current Obama purge of the military, over 200+ high command military officers and counting, is due to the fact that many commanders have threatened to “stand down” over several issues including Obama’s planned invasion of Syria. Until Obama has a military he can trust to betray the American people, he must rely on foreign (i.e. UN) assets in order to carry out any controversial activities such as door-to-door gun confiscation.

The UN is imposing limits on ammunition and magazines for all member nations. However, in joint training exercises being conducted between the US military forces and various foreign military forces, they are indeed going to the next level by training to seize American guns being stored in American homes. And, in the future, these foreign troops will likely consist of Russian and Chinese troops operating under the auspices of the United Nations.

Even FOX News has expressed concern over the UN Treaty which bans guns. The National Rifle Association has expressed their concern as well and for a very good set of reasons.

I have detailed in this column how the globalists are coming for your pensions, 401K’s, IRA’s, social security, healthcare freedom, bank accounts and your property (i.e. MERS mortgage fraud). Before the globalist can help themselves to your personal possessions, they must first disarm all that they consider to be philosophically opposed to accept the type of bondage that the elite have planned for all of us in America.

Gun Confiscation As a Prelude to Extermination

The UN prescription for disarming America, and it has worked so well in other countries.

The United Nations prides itself on disarming groups of people, only to have these people become the victims of genocide. This pattern has been prevalent in Africa as the UN has forcibly disarmed numerous African nations using foreign troops, and the vacuum of power has led in several cases to genocidal atrocities as a direct result of seizing individual guns. This is what the UN has in store for the United States.

Republic Magazine noted that, in 1994, the Hutu tribal militias targeted another ethnic population, the Tutsis, for genocidal extermination and one million Tutsis were subsequently murdered in 90 days. Prior to the genocide, the Tutsis had their guns confiscated by United Nations blue-helmeted, peacekeeping forces under the supervision of soon-to-be UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. The bloodbath in Rwanda can be laid squarely at the feet of the United Nations and its gun confiscation policies.

The Darfur crisis in Sudan was made possible by UN confiscation of the innocents. Also, as a result of seizing the guns of innocent people, the Burma (Myanmar) massacre was permitted to occur under UN supervision.

Armed troops representing carbon trading corporations related to the Agenda 21 serving policies of the United Nations and to the World Bank, burned down homes and killed men, women and children as the blue helmets evicted 40,000 Ugandans under the premise of conserving lands in order to counter climate change.

According to the UN’s own disarmament website, a “regional instrument that aims to curtail small arms ownership and illicit trafficking in Southern Africa along with the destruction of surplus state weapons. It is a far-reaching instrument, which goes beyond that of a politically binding declaration, providing the region with a legal basis upon which to deal with both the legal and the illicit trade in firearms.” The UN is calling for the use of foreign troops to seize guns in member countries. 

The Chinese and Gun Confiscation

Interestingly, in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook event, the Communist Chinese called for more strict controls over American guns. What? Why would the most repressive regime on the planet, the Communist Chinese, care about gun control in America? Because an emerging set of developments would indicate that the Chinese are going to be spearheading, along with the Russians, gun confiscation on American soil. And since the Chinese military has such a heinous reputation, one can assume that they will be carrying out gun confiscation with extreme prejudice.

The Chinese are here on American soil and were invited to participate in the recently completed Grid EX II drill. This is the height of either stupidity or treason. In the last several months, the Chinese have threatened to nuke us over our intentions to invade Syria and Iran, and we are letting them see the vulnerabilities of our power grid? Does anyone else think this is insane? However, the Chinese presence on American soil for Grid EX II is just a foothold in relation to what is coming.

Why would the United States of America allow the country it recently accused of a major cyber attack on its weapons systems, just a few months ago, be invited to practice disaster relief on our home soil? The country in question would be Communist China, and now they have troops on our soil.

This presence of Communist Chinese army is very disturbing. Let me make this clear, the Chinese are not our friends. Why would we give the Chinese the keys to our innermost secrets such as the vulnerabilities of our power grid?

The next set of RIMPAC war games are set to commence next year in 2014. One of the features of the RIMPAC war games is to conduct a joint military exercise in preparation to fight the Chinese and Russians in the Pacific. Therefore, one has to seriously question why the RIMPAC games have invited the Chinese and the Russians to participate. Are we to naively believe that the Russians and the Chinese are training to fight the Russians and the Chinese in the Pacific? Why would we be showing the Chinese and the Russians our secretly held plans to specifically fight them in the Pacific? This is absolute treason! It is treason unless there is now another overriding objective behind the RIMPAC games.

The Chinese are on American soil for one reason, they are being integrated into an international “peacekeeping force”, formerly known as the RIMPAC war games, which will eventually be controlled by the United Nations. This is where the formal integration of American-based Chinese military forces into an international “peace keeping force” will become official in 2014. This will mark the first time that the communist regime, that is responsible for murdering more innocent people than any other country in human history, will have its military and war ships participating in the “RIMPAC war games” off the US coast. Russian troops are also participating in this multinational force. RIMPAC occurs after we allowed the Chinese and the Russians observe the vulnerabilities of the power grid during the Grid EX II drill. The RIMPAC war games are the largest war games in the world. It is not far-fetched at all to believe that RIMPAC is morphing into an international “peacekeeping force” under the control of the United Nations since the original purpose, training to fight Russians and Chinese, is obviously no longer the purpose.

Now it makes sense why Obama is facing wholesale mutiny from the military and why he has found it necessary to replace as many senior level commanders as possible.

When one considers the implications of the Chinese participation in Grid EX II, the RIMPAC war games along with Chinese government’s comments regarding the need for gun control in the US,  speaks to the Chinese as being the enforcers of the UN Small Arms Treaty Ban. Secretary of State John Kerry illegally signed this UN treaty without the required Senate ratification.

A Brief History Lesson

1. In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves against their ethnic-cleansing government, were arrested and exterminated.

2. In 1929, the former Soviet Union established gun control as a means of controlling the “more difficult” of their citizens. From 1929 to the death of Stalin, 40 million Soviets met an untimely end at the hand of various governmental agencies as they were arrested and exterminated.

3. After the rise of the Nazis, Germany established their version of gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves against the “Brown Shirts”, were arrested and exterminated. Interestingly, these “Brown Shirts” were eventually targeted for extermination themselves following their blind acts of allegiance to Hitler. Any American military and police would be wise to grasp the historical significance of the Brown Shirts’ fate.

4. After Communist China established gun control in 1935, an estimated 50-60 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves against their fascist leaders, were arrested and exterminated.

5. Closer to home, Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayans, unable to defend themselves against their ruthless dictatorship, were arrested and exterminated.

6. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves from their dictatorial government, were arrested and exterminated.

7. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million of the “educated” people, unable to defend themselves against their fascist government, were arrested and exterminated.

8. In 1994, Rwanda disarmed the Tutsi people and being unable to defend themselves from their totalitarian government, nearly one million were summarily executed.

The total number of people killed in the 20th century due to democide, death by government, is fixed at 262 million people. Each and every action of democide was preceded by gun confiscation.

Conclusion

The American people are one false flag event away from gun confiscation followed by absolute tyranny. However, we do have a choice.

The American people must vigorously oppose the presence of foreign troops on our soil. Make your elected representatives feel the heat (I know that this is a fools errand). The American people must resolve to never give up their guns under any circumstance as it leads to mass genocide. And since when should the American people ever bow down to the dictates of the United Nations?

I have always advocated change through peaceful action. However, gun confiscation is a game changer. Americans must resist the coming UN seizure of its guns with all means at our disposal. I say so because I know how things will end if we ever give up our guns. The past is normally prologue.

Credit to Common Sense

The dinosaur media is in terminal decline

The dinosaur media is in terminal decline but it will not go down without a fight, which is why the establishment is relying on a number of different techniques to remain relevant while strangling its competition.

Recent polls show that trust in mainstream media is hovering at record lows. Print journalism is fast becoming a distant memory as the establishment press rapidly loses its audience to independent media outlets on the Internet.

Far from accepting its fate meekly, the system has rolled out the big guns in a desperate bid to either eliminate or assimilate the burgeoning alternative press.

The latest example is buried within the secretive Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement (TPP) and concerns “intellectual property enforcement.” Put simply, the agreement will mandate ISPs to remove online content without the need for a burden of proof or any kind of legal process, greasing the skids for aggressive and disproportionate censorship-driven takedowns.

“If instituted, the TPP’s IP regime would trample over individual rights and free expression, as well as ride roughshod over the intellectual and creative commons,” reads a Wikileaks statement. “If you read, write, publish, think, listen, dance, sing or invent; if you farm or consume food; if you’re ill now or might one day be ill, the TPP has you in its crosshairs.”

Another way the mainstream media is trying to strangle alternative voices that might challenge its narrative is by phasing out or banning article comments altogether.

Studies confirm that article comment sections – for better or worse – are heavily swaying public opinion.

Popular Science and BoingBoing.net recently announced their decision to kill comment sections on their website. The New York Times alsorecently indicated that it is scaling back comments and removing them from some articles altogether.

As an excellent Daily Tech piece highlights, Popular Science admitted that its decision to pull the comment section was in order to preach a “scientific doctrine” on global warming without being challenged.

The move to kill off comments altogether comes after a largely failed attempt on behalf of major companies and governments around the world to hire armies of paid employees to troll comments by disseminating pro-establishment positions in a bid to shift popular perceptions.

In 2010, the Canadian government announced it would, “monitor online chatter about political issues and correct what it perceives as misinformation.”

Turkey, Israel, China, are just some of the governments openly hiring paid trolls to steer public opinion, while the Pentagon announced earlier this year that it is stepping up its public relations efforts in order to counter scandals about the U.S. government emerging on huge but non-establishment news outlets like the Drudge Report.

Credit to Infowars

Texas Drivers Stopped At Roadblock Asked For DNA Test

Dow will crash below 13,000

Alien Implants

Radiation Still at Dangerous Levels on West Coast

Judge: Owner can't lecture employees on religion

A southwest Iowa grocery store owner who lectured an employee on her religious beliefs must pay her unemployment benefits, a state judge has ruled.

The case centered on a question that often divides civil libertarians and people of faith: Do business owners have the right to advocate for their religious beliefs in discussions with employees?

The store owner, Tyler Stille, says his faith is an integral part of his business and all of his 15 employees were made aware of that before they were hired.

“We have a Christian fish symbol on our sign,” he said. “Before we hire anybody, we tell them our faith. We play Christian music in our store all the time, and we always make sure that’s OK with them because that’s a part of our life.”

The employee, Sherri Chafin of Tabor, says Stille’s beliefs “didn’t bother me one bit — not until he started preaching to me and telling me that I had to read a part of the Bible.”

At that point, she says, she quit.

“I don’t believe in the Bible,” she said.

“I was never big on Christianity because I just don’t believe in the churches and worshipping God one day of the week in a building.”

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that workers cannot be forced to participate in religious activity as a condition of employment at a typical, non-faith-based business. The courts have held that business owners are free to share with workers their own religious beliefs, but also said that unwanted proselytizing is a form of religious harassment.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says unwelcome religious statements or actions amount to harassment only if the conduct is unwelcome and so pervasive that the worker “reasonably finds the work environment to be hostile or abusive.”

Randall Wilson, legal director for the ACLU of Iowa, said business owners must be mindful of how their words and actions are perceived by employees.

“A certain amount of stating one’s opinion and beliefs is tolerated, but the courts have generally, I think, put themselves in the position of the person who is on the receiving end,” he said. “If a reasonable person could conclude there is some pressure being applied, the employer could certainly be in trouble.”

Chafin worked for the Tabor Market & Deli from September 2011 to January 2012, when she walked off the job.

She later applied for unemployment benefits, but due to a series of administrative conflicts, a public hearing on her claim wasn’t held until May of this year.

According to Chafin’s testimony at the hearing, the meeting she had with Stille on her last day of employment began with the store owner preaching to her about the wisdom of King Solomon, and then questioning her lifestyle.

“He told me that I should read one psalm, or one chapter, per day, something like that,” Chafin testified at her unemployment hearing.

“He asked me if I was receiving food stamps, or any welfare, or anything like that. He told me that if I was, it was unjust because I worked and I lived with my roommate — who is my boyfriend and we’re not married. He called me a ‘crapster’ and told me to ‘shut and listen.’… I was crying. He was very intimidating.”

Stille allegedly told Chafin he intended to replace her and would be going through job applications at the store, then ended the meeting. Chafin left the store and never returned.

At the hearing, Stille said that during Chafin’s employment, the two of them spent hours wrapping meat together while discussing matters of faith “and where she was at in life.”

Stille said he complimented Chafin on her work ethic, calling her a “workhorse,” and said his final meeting with her was prompted by Chafin making an inappropriate remark to a customer. He said he began the meeting by asking his wife for a Bible because it was his intent to read Chafin some proverbs.

He said Chafin quickly became “pretty much belligerent.”

He walked out, he said, because Chafin was “crying hysterically” and he couldn’t communicate with her.

Stille said that although he had previously questioned Chafin about her faith and her reliance on food stamps, there was little or no discussion along those lines the day she quit.

“We had (previously) talked Bible-talk for quite some time and, in fact, Sherri, in December, had given us a very beautiful religious card thanking us not only for employment and everything we had talked about and what have you,” he testified. “So I guess I am a little dumbfounded that all of a sudden she has an issue with Christianity.”

Asked by Administrative Law Judge Julie Elder if he believed he could be “kind of intense,” Stille responded: “I’m a small-town business owner that has deep roots in the community. Love our community. Love our employees. … Am I intense? You bet. You know, it’s hard in today’s world to make a living in a small town and employ so many — especially so many kids.”

Elder sided with Chafin in the case, awarding her benefits after finding that Stille’s conduct was, at best, “inappropriate, unacceptable and unprofessional,” and had created an intolerable work environment.

His conduct also was potentially unlawful, she ruled.

“He effectively held her hostage in his office and lectured her regarding his religious and moral beliefs and her alleged shortcomings in his eyes,” Elder ruled.

Stille said this week in an interview that he was “shocked” by Elder’s decision.

“It’s just a lot of baloney and it’s more of government getting involved where it shouldn’t,” he said. “I’m just really frustrated with the whole mess.”

As for Chafin, she may be less likely to run into workplace proselytizing in her current job at Romantix, an adults-only store in western Iowa that sells merchandise of a sexual nature.

“I’ve been there for 14 months now,” she told The Des Moines Register this week. “I’ve never had any problems with my boss.”

Credit to Desmoinesregister.com