Poland Is Quietly Mobilizing Its Army Reservists

It seems the words of Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk warning that “theworld stands on the brink of conflict, the consequences of which are not foreseen... Not everyone in Europe is aware of this situation," are a little more real than some (US equity buyers) might suspect. As The Week's Crispin Black reports, at least 7,000 Polish workers in Europe have received call-up papers as army reservists in the last few weeks. Polish authorities dismiss it as "routine" but the men note this has never happened before.

As The Week's Crispin Black goes on to note,

At least 7,000 reservists have been recalled to the colours for immediate exercises lasting between 10 and 30 days.

They’re told by the Polish authorities that the call-ups are “routine”: but the men say they haven’t been asked before and they’re well aware of the growing alarm in Warsaw at President Putin’s aggression.

Three weeks ago, their Prime Minister, Donald Tusk, called a press conference to warn that “the world stands on the brink of conflict, the consequences of which are not foreseen… Not everyone in Europe is aware of this situation.”

My own view is that Putin was initially more concerned with righting a specific historical wrong in Crimea than starting a new Cold War.  This is still probably the case despite the dawning truth that the EU/Nato Emperor really has no clothes at all. 

But in the worst case scenario of a truly revanchist Russia, Poland certainly has the borders from hell.  Starting from the top, it abuts Kaliningrad (the Russian exclave on the Baltic carved at the end of the war from East Prussia), Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine.

None of these borders relies on any natural barriers like rivers or mountain ranges – they are just lines on a map drawn by Stalin in the full flush of victory.  No wonder the Poles are feeling vulnerable.

Credit to Zero Hedge

NATO Can’t Be Trusted to Tell the Truth About Russia and Ukraine

U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove, the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, said Sunday Russia is using snap military exercises in preparation of a military invasion of Ukraine.

“A snap exercise puts an incredible force at a border. The force that is at the Ukrainian border now to the east is very, very sizeable and very, very ready,” Breedlove said.

“You cannot defend against that if you are not there to defend against it. So I think we need to think about our allies, the positioning of our forces in the alliance and the readiness of those forces… such that we can be there to defend against it if required, especially in the Baltics and other places.”

He said Russia has its military “postured on the eastern border of Ukraine to run to Trans-Dniester if the decision was made to do that, and that is very worrisome.” Trans-Dniester is a region on the border of Ukraine and neighboring Moldova. It has autonomous status and a large Russian majority.

Breedlove made the remarks during an event held by the German Marshall Fund. Members of the globalist think tank include David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank. The Ford Foundation, the Club of Rome, the Committee of 300, the Aspen Institute, and other internationalist organizations also collaborate with the think tank. In addition to creating NATO, the organization funds the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission.

In Ukraine, the junta put into place with the assistance of the U.S. State Department has issued dire warnings about a Russian invasion of the eastern part of the country. “The aim of Putin is not Crimea but all of Ukraine,” Andriy Parubiy, Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council boss, told a rally in Kyiv. “His troops massed at the border are ready to attack at any moment,” Parubiy warned.

The establishment media in the United States is now reporting a Russian invasion is inevitable. Breedlove’s remarks about Russia are repeated without comment and are stripped of historical context by a corporate media disingenuously claiming to be fair and balanced.

Obama, Congress, and NATO all declare Russia will soon invade and annex its former Soviet satellite states. The establishment media, however, omits the fact that NATO and the West have successfully annexed 12 countries that were members of the Warsaw Pact and three former members of the Soviet Union. This occurred despite assurances by the United States it would not move on Eastern Europe after the fall of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev was told that if Soviet troops withdrew from East Germany, NATO would not move “one inch east,” a promise the U.S. soon violated.

From Spiegel Online, dated November 26, 2009:

What the US secretary of state said on Feb. 9, 1990 in the magnificent St. Catherine’s Hall at the Kremlin is beyond dispute. There would be, in [James] Baker’s words, “no extension of NATO’s jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east,” provided the Soviets agreed to the NATO membership of a unified Germany. Moscow would think about it, Gorbachev said, but added: “any extension of the zone of NATO is unacceptable.”

In addition to the United States, Germany assured Russia it would not move on its former territory. German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher told Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze in February, 1990, he was “aware that NATO membership for a unified Germany raises complicated questions. For us, however, one thing is certain: NATO will not expand to the east.”

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev complained that none “of the things that we were assured, namely that NATO would not expand endlessly eastwards and our interests would be continuously taken into consideration” were honored.

By the late 1990s, the U.S. had moved to include Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic in NATO as part of an effort, according to then Secretary of Defense William Cohen, to promote “more democracy, stability and prosperity in Europe.”

In addition to Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovakia – all formerly part of the Soviet Union – eventually became part of the NATO club.

In 1999, the United States and NATO hatched a plot to invade Yugoslavia under the pretense of humanitarian intervention, a scheme that would later figure large in U.S. interventions and invasions.

“NATO’s ‘humanitarian’ enterprise in Kosovo was built on a structure of lies, many of them flowing from NATO headquarters and officials of the NATO powers, and uncritically passed along by the mainstream media of the NATO countries,” write Edward S. Herman and David Peterson.

The word “genocide” was used to describe Serbian operations in Kosovo against the Kosovo Liberation Army, which targeted Serbs, including mail carriers. The KLA consisted of former Marxist-Leninists and members of a drug cartel. Prior to the US-NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, the Clinton administration cultivated a partnership with the KLA despite an earlier proclamation that the group was a terrorist organization.

In addition to outright invasions and less than opaque support for color revolutions in former communist countries, NATO and the US have staged a number of provocative military exercises on the outskirts of Russia, a fact ignored as the U.S. and its propaganda media criticize Russian military exercises within its own country and portray the drills as preparations for an invasion and annexation of Ukraine and,according to Breedlove and NATO, Moldova.

“We are seeing today a revival of this containment policy, which was designed to curb Soviet, might throughout the cold war. In addition to containment there is a conscious intent by Brussels (NATO HQ) and Washington to strangle Russia, by cutting it completely off from sea and land access beyond its borders or for its fleet and military supplies to remain mobile,” writes Michael Werbowski.

“The current crisis in Ukraine has made it plainly evident the West and by extension NATO wants to continue its eastward push or incursion into Russia’s front lawn and the same time try to scuttle all attempts by Moscow to create the formation of an alternative strategic, economic and yes military alliance to NATO,” Werbowski continues.

In addition, the Russians accused NATO of destabilizing states in the region, deploying troops in areas neighboring Russia, installing strategic missile systems on its borders, making territorial claims against Russia and its allies, interference in their internal affairs, and exacerbating “armed conflicts on territories neighboring Russia and allied nations.”

In 2010, Russia warned of the possibility of war due to NATO’s expansionism. “The goal of NATO to arrogate to itself the assumption of global functions in violation of international law, and to expand the military infrastructure of NATO nations to Russia’s borders including through expansion of the bloc,” the document states.

The possibility of war, either intentionally or by accident, has increased significantly over the last month as the U.S. and NATO engage in brinkmanship over the situation in Ukraine.

The corporate media in the United States has performed its usual task of rationalizing a move toward war by characterizing Russia as a brutal aggressor, a portrayal that has used lurid comparisons to Hitler and the annexation of Czechoslovakia and the Sudetenland while ignoring past moves by NATO to confront Russia, diminish its influence over political and economic conditions in its own backyard, and slowly chip away its territorial integrity.

Credit to Infowars

'God's Not Dead' Hits No. 5 at US Box Office with Just 780 Screens

God's Not Dead, a low-budget film that portrays a college student who accepts his atheist professor's challenge to provide a defense for the existence of God and Christianity, played in 780 screens this weekend, earning enough to be ranked No. 5 overall in the U.S. box office, behind 300: Rise of an Empire.

The film is already in seventh place for all-time box office haul among all faith-based movies, and in first place for those that opened in fewer than 1,000 screens, according to Box Office Mojo. For reference,Courageous and Fireproof brought in $9.1 and $6.8 million respectively.

The film adaption of young adult novel Divergent, by Christian author Veronica Roth - starring Shailene Woodley and Theo James - was the number one film of the weekend, taking in $55 million.

Willie Robertson, the CEO of Duck Commander, and his wife Korie, who play themselves in the God's Not Dead, recently told The Christian Post that he felt the film "really raised the bar."

"I've seen some Christian movies where the acting's not as good or the story's not as good, or it's just a lower budget film," he said, noting that he found the storyline "very compelling."

Robertson said he also felt that God's Not Dead could be helpful for young Christians in the Academy trying to make sense of their Christianity.

"At college, kids really have to learn their own faith," Robertson said. "I think this is a great tool to help them do that."

Son of God, the other Christian film currently in theaters, fell to No. 11 at the U.S. box office this weekend, taking in $2.65 million.

The History Channel series-turned big screen motion picture has made an estimated $55 million at the box office since it opened on February 28.

God's Not Dead was produced by Pure Flix Entertainment and Red Entertainment Group and stars Disney Channel actor Shane Harper, whose show Good Luck Charlie drew controversy earlier this year when it became the first show on The Disney Channel to include a same-sex couple.

Credit to Christian Post

No Ukrainian Military Units Left in Crimea

SIMFEROPOL, MARCH 24 (RIA Novosti ) – All military units stationed in Crimea are now under the control of the Russian military, and remaining Ukrainian servicemen are departing the peninsula, the region’s first deputy prime minister, Rustam Temirgaliyev, said on Monday.

As Crimea’s reunification process began last week, a total of 147 military units in the predominantly Russian-ethnic region have replaced Ukrainian flags with Russian ones and applied to join the Russian armed forces.

“All Ukrainian military personnel have either joined Russia or are leaving Crimea,” Temirgaliyev said.

Shortly after Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree on Friday to ratify the reunification treaty, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said those soldiers wishing to continue their service with the Ukrainian armed forces were free to leave Crimea and will receive the required assistance to do so.

The Russian Defense Ministry said over the weekend that only 2,000 out of 18,000 Ukrainian troops serving in Crimea decided to leave the peninsula.

On Monday, Shoigu appointed the former head of Ukraine’s navy as deputy commander of the Russian Black Sea fleet during a visit to Crimea.

Rear Adm. Denis Berezovsky swore allegiance to the people of Crimea earlier this month two days after he had been appointed commander of the Ukrainian navy by the country’s Western-backed government.




Credit to RIA Novosti

The Federal Reserve Seems Quite Serious About Tapering So What Comes Next?

Will this be the year when the Fed's quantitative easing program finally ends?  For a long time, many analysts were proclaiming that the Fed would never taper.  But then it started happening.  Then a lot of them started talking about how "the untaper" was right around the corner.  That hasn't happened either.  It looks like that under Janet Yellen the Fed is quite determined to bring the quantitative easing program to a close by the end of this year.  Up until now, the financial markets have been slow to react because there has been a belief that the Fed would reverse course on tapering the moment that the U.S. economy started to slow down again.  But even though the U.S. middle class is in horrible shape, and even though there are lots of signs that we are heading into another recession, the Fed has continued tapering.

Of course it is important to note that the Fed is still absolutely flooding the financial system with money even after the announcement of more tapering on Wednesday.  When you are talking about $55,000,000,000 a month, you are talking about a massive amount of money.  So the Fed is not exactly being hawkish.

But when Yellen told the press that quantitative easing could end completely this fall and that the Fed could actually start raising interest rates about six months after that, it really spooked the markets.

The Dow was down 114 points on Wednesday, and the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasuries shot up to 2.77%.  The following is how CNBCdescribed the reaction of the markets on Wednesday...

Despite a seemingly dovish tone, markets recoiled at remarks from Yellen, who said interest rate increases likely would start six months after the monthly bond-buying program ends. If the program winds down in the fall, that would put a rate hike in the spring of 2015, earlier than market expectations for the second half of the year.

Stocks tumbled as Yellen spoke at her initial post-meeting news conference, with the Dow industrials at one point sliding more than 200 points before shaving those losses nearly in half. Short-term interest rates rose appreciably, with the five-year note moving up 0.135 percentage points. The seven-year note tumbled more than one point in price.

But this is just the beginning.  When it finally starts sinking in, and investors finally start realizing that the Fed is 100% serious about ending the flow of easy money, that is when things will start getting really interesting.

Can the financial markets stand on their own without massive Fed intervention?

We shall see.  Even now there are lots of signs that a market crash could be coming up in the not too distant future.  For much more on this, please see my previous article entitled "Is 'Dr. Copper' Foreshadowing A Stock Market Crash Just Like It Did In 2008?"

And what is going to happen to the market for U.S. Treasuries once the Fed stops gobbling them up?

Where is the demand going to come from?

In recent months, foreign demand for U.S. debt has really started to dry up.  Considering recent developments in Ukraine, it is quite certain that Russia will not be accumulating any more U.S. debt, and China has announced that it is "no longer in China’s favor to accumulate foreign-exchange reserves" and China actually dumped about 50 billion dollars of U.S. debt during the month of December alone.

Collectively, Russia and China account for about a quarter of all foreign-owned U.S. debt.  If you take them out of the equation, foreign demand for U.S. debt is not nearly as strong.

Will domestic sources be enough to pick up the slack?  Or will we see rates really start to rise once the Fed steps to the sidelines?

And of course rates on U.S. government debt should actually be much higher than they are right now.  It simply does not make sense to loan the U.S. government massive amounts of money at interest rates that are far below the real rate of inflation.

If free market forces are allowed to prevail, it is inevitable that interest rates on U.S. debt will go up substantially, and that will mean higher interest rates on mortgages, cars, and just about everything else.

Of course the central planners at the Federal Reserve could choose to reverse course at any time and start pumping again.  This is the kind of thing that can happen when you don't have a true free market system.

The truth is that the Federal Reserve is at the very heart of the economic and financial problems of this country.  When the Fed intervenes and purposely distorts the operation of free markets, the Fed creates economic and financial bubbles which inevitably burst later on.  We saw this happen during the great financial crisis of 2008, and now it is happening again.

This is what happens when you allow an unelected, unaccountable group of central planners to have far more power over our economy than anyone else in our society does.

Most people don't realize this, but the greatest period of economic growth in all of U.S. history was when there was no central bank.

We don't need a Federal Reserve.  In fact, the performance of the Federal Reserve has been absolutely disastrous.

Since the Fed was created just over 100 years ago, the U.S. dollar has lost more than 96 percent of its value, and the size of the U.S. national debt has gotten more than 5000 times larger.  The Fed is at the very center of a debt-based financial system that has trapped us, our children and our grandchildren in an endless spiral of debt slavery.

And now we are on the verge of the greatest financial crisis that the United States has ever seen.  The economic and financial storm that is about to unfold is ultimately going to be even worse than the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Things did not have to turn out this way.

Congress could have shut down the Federal Reserve long ago.

But our "leaders" never seriously considered doing such a thing, and the mainstream media kept telling all of us how much we desperately needed central planners to run our financial system.

Well, now those central planners have brought us to the brink of utter ruin, and yet only a small minority of Americans are calling for change.

Soon, we will all get to pay a great price for this foolishness.  A great financial storm is fast approaching, and it is going to be exceedingly painful.

Credit to Economic Collapse

The Agenda 21 Water Police Are Making Their Move to Enslave American Communities

The globalists murdered Detroit through the various free trade agreements consisting of NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA. And now, their Agenda 21 minions are coming for your water, your homes and your children. 

There are several parts to this story. First, there is the human interest story of corrupt city forces who are abusing people from a bankrupt city who are down on their luck and are reveling in the joy of bringing misery to the downtrodden. Second, we see CPS rearing their ugly faces as they are attempting to take advantage of a crisis situation by placing more children under their control. Third, we are witnessing the attempted installation of the “Building One America Plan” which will force all suburban residents into densely populated stack and pack cities through the regionalization of the control of water supplies. This article examines the dangers posed to American communities through an examination of these three areas related to water control and what it could potentially mean for all US citizens.

“We Are Coming for Your Homes”

As of a week ago, any Detroit resident who is more than 60 days late on the payment of their water bill will be eligible to have a property tax lien placed on their property which could result in the foreclosure and forfeiture of their home, declared the Detroit Water and Sewage Board (DWSB). The DWSB has created a financial incentive by making it more difficult for people to pay their bills. The financial motive to the DWSB is apparent.

The department is gearing up for an aggressive campaign to shut off service to 1,500-3,000 delinquent water accounts according to Darryl Latimer, DWBS’ deputy director. Latimer insists that “Usually folks will then come in and make some kind of arrangement,” and that not paying your water bill has long lasting consequences. How well does this “get tough” policy work when it comes to a city that graduates less than half of it students, in a city where homes can be bought for a $100 and the median price of a home in Detroit is only $9,000, the estimated REAL unemployment rate is approaching 40%, and the police station only stays open for public business eight hours per day? By the way, Detroit residents are now only allowed a one time “adjustment” in their payment obligations for their water bills. I wonder where Mr. Latimer thinks that money is going to come from with regard to the destitute of Detroit?

Are Detroit officials waiting to gobble up these $9,000 homes? It would seem so, because extra contractors have been hired to shut off the water, as I write these words.

As this plot unfolds, it strongly appears that Detroit city officials have been shown how they can make money through the rigid enforcement of their water collection policies and this opens the door for more nefarious Agenda 21 forces to gain a bigger foothold in Detroit.

Is CPS Waiting in the Wings to Profit From This Crisis?

In a disturbing development, The Detroit News is reporting that residents that cannot pay their water bills don’tnecessarily have to move out according to Latimer. Latimer is now talking out of both sides of his mouth. On one hand a delinquent water user is told that they will lose their home if one cannot pay their water bill and simultaneously he is saying that  if you have kids, you don’t have to move, but you could lose your kids to CPS.

It is hard to not read these two contradictory statements and conclude that Latimer is telling parents, we only want your homes if you have no kids. But if you have kids and cannot pay your bill, we want your kids and you can keep your home.

Latimer is quite clear on this point as he made both statements, in the same article to the Detroit News. He warns that if there are children in these households with water that has been shut off, the Department of Social Services will arrive on the scene and will remove the children from their parents.

To some people, the move to remove children under these conditions would seem prudent. Most sheep will not smell a rat. However, this development should raise red flags for all of those researchers who have followed the CPS practices of abducting children and then having many of these children mysteriously disappear, while in the custody of CPS. In circumstances, such as these, the fate of children is not the only thing to be worried about. Just take a look at the fate of the late State Senator from Georgia, the late Nancy Schaefer who exposed these abuses.

Detroit Entities & Suburbs Are Struggling to Pay Their Bills

The Detroit area is broke and I am not only referring to the people that cannot pay their bills. The cities are broke as are the schools. Thus, this is a spreading problem that has not even begun to peak.

1. The Detroit Public Schools owed $12 million dollars in 2012.

2. The city of Highland Park has accrued $17.4 million in sewerage bills and $1.6 million in water bills

3. The city of Melvindale also has an overdue balance of nearly $1.1 million in water and sewerage bills.

All three entities and more (e.g. city of Redford, Dearborn, etc) risk going into receivership in the same manner as bankrupt Detroit and the debt often begins with their unpaid DWSB bill. This is ominous because so many communities across America are going through this same kind of scenario. As bad as this may be, the worst is yet to come.

The number of insolvent cities is growing by leaps and bounds. What steps will they take to remain a viable entity? How much abuse lies in our future over this issue?

The following paragraphs will provide the reader with the blueprint of what this will ultimately mean to millions of Americans.

Detroit Is Embracing Agenda 21 Policies Through This Crisis

The Detroit Emergency Manager, Kevyn Orr, sent out notices to three counties in an attempt to get suburban leaders to come to a consensus on giving away their local authority to an “unelected” regional authority which will control water. Orr is attempting to use water and sewer bills as the excuse to form such a coalition. I quickly recognized this as the Building One America scheme and it is the poster child of population migration under Agenda 21 in which population shifts from suburban and rural to dense inner city and money connected to essential services is the key to nudging this shift.

Building One America represents regional control of assets and is granted to an unelected regional authority in places like St. Paul/Minneapolis and San Francisco as a means to force suburban residents to abandon their outlying homes for the stack and pack inner cities. This program is the real Agenda 21. President Obama’s first mentor in community organizing, Mike Krulig, and his Building One America are behind this.

The picture of Obama and Krulig that the White House does not want you to see.

Most of you have never heard of Krulig or Building One America and there is a good reason for their anonymity. If a majority of the American people were to discover Krulig’s true intentions for suburban dwelling Americans, they would chase him down the street and string he and his people up from the nearest light poles. The White House has tried to conceal this association with Krulig, but thanks to the Breitbart people, a picture exists of Krulig appearing with Obama at the White House.

Here is how the program works. An unelected regional council is formed with the goal of controlling assets such as vehicle mileage tax, property tax or water. Differential rates, for essential products or services, are charged to the people in the suburbs at a higher rate than are the residents in core inner cities. The goal is to force the eradication of suburbs in favor of dense inner city living and to use the power of the purse to accomplish this goal.

This is not some futuristic goal, the practice is already in evidence in Detroit proper as residents pay about25% less than suburban water customers. Since the water comes from the same source, how can this be justified? It cannot be justified, however, this is part of the plan. The Agenda 21 people from Building One America charge so much more for a product that people feel compelled to move to the cheaper location. And we are not just talking water, we are talking home heating/cooling and vehicle mileage taxes (VMT). If enough economic pain can be generated in the suburbs, the desired migration may occur naturally.

Already In St. Paul/Minneapolis, San Francisco and Portland, road pricing for the VMT is being implemented to force drivers out of their cars. This will impact all drivers except for the Obama inspired exemption of low income drivers. The VMT is designed to give favored status to certain groups. These groups represent organizations that want to transfer wealth through the heavy hand of regional government interfering in the housing, transportation and land use market place. The wealth transfer is to flow from the wealthier middle class to economically disadvantaged inner city residents. This tyranny is also being beta tested in the (San Francisco) Bay area in a project entitled One Bay Area Plan. One Bay Area Plan is a 25 year plan which combines housing, transportation, and Agenda 21.

It is obvious that Detroit is following the same plan of action with regard to its water in exactly the same manner as Building One America.  Detroit’s regional water plan is right out of the Agenda 21 Communist playbook. Paying customers will end up paying higher rates on bills for those from whom the utility can’t collect. The cost of noncollection is passed from poor to the financially stable. The money will flow from the suburbs to the inner city, Latimer explains.

Detroit Suburbs Reject Their Version of Building One America

Fortunately for the citizens of the Detroit area, the local suburban leaders have some common sense. Orr has been forced to temporarily reject the regionalization plan for water because too many cities were dragging their feet. I expect that this is only a temporary solution, at least for the time being.

Orr said he is actively moving ahead with a second plan which consists of selling the city-owned system or leasing it to a private management firm (i.e. a public-private partnership) which will result in an unelected corporate board selling water at any rate it desires and their power will be beyond the control of the people. Orr told The Detroit News that he will send out requests for information in a couple of weeks or sooner gaging interest from private operators. So, even if regionalization is temporarily halted, the net effect will be the same which will be differential rates for the suburbs vs. the inner city and a plan to have the financially solvent pay the water bills of the poor.

Implications for the Future

For anyone who truly understands Agenda 21, we all know that ultimately the UN inspired plan is about installing a Soviet style form of government by removing local decision makers from the power of the electorate. Building One America is not about controlling just one resource or product in order to manipulate behavior or geographic choice of living, it is about controlling everything. From HOA’s to the Charter School movement, we see the move away from elected representation and control by the people, to self-serving Agenda 21 bureaucrats who impose their will on an increasingly enslaved population.

The Death of America

Much is being written in the present climate related to how Putin is effectively isolating America from our traditional allies and the end of the Petrodollar is near which will spell the end of the dollar and our way of life.

If America is not militarily conquered, it will become occupied as a puppet state of whomever the globalists choose. The Russians and Chinese are posturing to become our new landlords. This is where Agenda 21 comes in. The major threat posed by plans such as Building One America is not in today’s world. It is the Soviet blueprint of how America will be structured after the political/economic/military fall of our nation. Subsequently, Americans are caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place.  In the present and spreading Ukraine crisis, we are fighting for our very economic and military survival. Shortly, we will be fighting for our right to exist under these policies because our new overlords will have the power over our most essential resources in order to control our behavior and they could even have the power to end our lives as Stalin did when he starved millions in Ukraine.

One final thought that should concern every parent who might lose their job and not be able to pay their bills. I think we should all consider the wisdom of letting such an organization such as CPS decide our children’s fate when we are in crisis. Nancy Shaefer was correct about what is going on inside of this organization.

Do you understand now why Obama would bail out Goldman Sachs but not the people of Detroit?

I hear Dancing with the Stars may be canceled. Maybe the awake among us will get some help in fighting against this tyranny.

Credit to Common Sense