Thursday, November 27, 2014
Nato commander warns Russia could control whole Black Sea
Nato's top military commander, Gen Philip Breedlove, has warned that Russian "militarisation" of the annexed Crimea Peninsula could be used to exert control over the whole Black Sea.
Speaking in Kiev, Gen Breedlove said Russian military assets being installed in Crimea would have an effect on "almost the entire Black Sea".
Mr Breedlove is in Ukraine for high-level talks with Ukrainian leaders.
Russia annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine in March 2014.
Russia's defence ministry said on Wednesday that it had deployed a batch of 14 military jets to Crimea, as part of a squadron of 30 that will be stationed on the peninsula.
An initial batch of fighter jets were flown to Crimea's Belbek air base "from military air bases in Krasnodar Territory," Russian agency Interfax reported.
Gen Breedlove had said earlier on Tuesday that a large number of Russian troops were also active inside Ukraine, training and advising separatist rebels.
Russia has continued to deny allegations from western countries that it played any direct role in the conflict in Ukraine, which has claimed more than 4,317 lives.
President Vladimir Putin said that Russia "poses no threat to anyone" and would "resist efforts to draw it into geopolitical intrigue," Russia's Tass news agency reported on Wednesday.
Credit to BBC
Scientist admits he is 'terrified' of the technology being developed to stop global warming
A climate scientist has said he is ‘terrified’ of the futuristic technologies he is helping to develop in a bid to slow global warming.
British academics have spent £5.4 million ($8.5 million) in the last five years on taxpayer-funded ‘geoengineering’ projects to stop the effects of climate change.
Dr Matthew Watson, lead investigator of a £1.8million ($2.8 million) project to pump chemicals into the atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays, said using such technologies will become inevitable if humanity fails to stop global warming.
Dr Watson from Bristol University said we should be wary of interfering with nature on a planetary scale - known as geoengineering. It involves changing our planet to counteract effects of climate change. Earth is shown here pictured from space
The Bristol University academic has already suffered a major setback, when much-trumpeted plans to send a huge balloon into the air to test his scheme was scrapped over a patenting dispute.
Yesterday he admitted that despite the millions already spent on research, scientists are still decades from seeing their dreams turn into reality.
And he said they could indeed be dangerous.
The schemes could see rainfall patterns change, droughts spread across the world and the ozone layer damaged beyond repair.
‘Personally, this stuff terrifies me,’ he said.
‘Whilst it is clear that temperatures could be reduced during deployment, the potential for misstep is considerable.
‘By identifying risks, we hope to contribute to the evidence base around geoengineering that will determine whether deployment, in the face of the threat of climate change, has the capacity to do more good than harm.’
But he added that it would be ‘unethical’ not to try the technology.
‘If we ever deploy these technologies it will be the closest indication yet that we've failed as planetary stewards.
‘But there is a point at which not deploying some technologies would be unethical.
‘It's a watershed for our relationship with the Earth and with nature. It fundamentally changes the way seven billion people are going to interact with the world, and I'm not sure the system is going to be controllable in the way we want.’
Three taxpayer-funded schemes will today publish the results of five years of research into geoengineering.
Each report will confirm that we are many years away from seeing any project work outside the laboratory.
One of the touted projects includes spraying low-level clouds with sea salt to make them reflective to the sun; another would pump aerosols or sulphur particles into the atmosphere to disperse sunlight; and others would see greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide sucked out of the air to reduce global warming.
Credit to dailymail.co.uk
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2849201/Scientist-admits-terrified-technology-developed-stop-global-warming.html#ixzz3KDgpzm8H
British academics have spent £5.4 million ($8.5 million) in the last five years on taxpayer-funded ‘geoengineering’ projects to stop the effects of climate change.
Dr Matthew Watson, lead investigator of a £1.8million ($2.8 million) project to pump chemicals into the atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays, said using such technologies will become inevitable if humanity fails to stop global warming.
Dr Watson from Bristol University said we should be wary of interfering with nature on a planetary scale - known as geoengineering. It involves changing our planet to counteract effects of climate change. Earth is shown here pictured from space
The Bristol University academic has already suffered a major setback, when much-trumpeted plans to send a huge balloon into the air to test his scheme was scrapped over a patenting dispute.
Yesterday he admitted that despite the millions already spent on research, scientists are still decades from seeing their dreams turn into reality.
And he said they could indeed be dangerous.
The schemes could see rainfall patterns change, droughts spread across the world and the ozone layer damaged beyond repair.
‘Personally, this stuff terrifies me,’ he said.
‘Whilst it is clear that temperatures could be reduced during deployment, the potential for misstep is considerable.
‘By identifying risks, we hope to contribute to the evidence base around geoengineering that will determine whether deployment, in the face of the threat of climate change, has the capacity to do more good than harm.’
But he added that it would be ‘unethical’ not to try the technology.
‘If we ever deploy these technologies it will be the closest indication yet that we've failed as planetary stewards.
‘But there is a point at which not deploying some technologies would be unethical.
‘It's a watershed for our relationship with the Earth and with nature. It fundamentally changes the way seven billion people are going to interact with the world, and I'm not sure the system is going to be controllable in the way we want.’
Three taxpayer-funded schemes will today publish the results of five years of research into geoengineering.
Each report will confirm that we are many years away from seeing any project work outside the laboratory.
One of the touted projects includes spraying low-level clouds with sea salt to make them reflective to the sun; another would pump aerosols or sulphur particles into the atmosphere to disperse sunlight; and others would see greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide sucked out of the air to reduce global warming.
Credit to dailymail.co.uk
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2849201/Scientist-admits-terrified-technology-developed-stop-global-warming.html#ixzz3KDgpzm8H
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)