We will have a mirror site at http://nunezreport.wordpress.com in case we are censored, Please save the link

Friday, February 6, 2015

Barack Obama Is Not a Christian in Any Meaningful Way



Barack Obama is not, in any meaningful way, a Christian and I am not sure he needs to continue the charade. With no more elections for him, he might as well come out as the atheist/agnostic that he is.1 He took his first step in doing so yesterday in a speech reeking with contempt for faith in general and Christianity in particular.
Saying that violent acts are not representative of Islam, the President then attacked Christians for the Crusades (started as a response to Islamic invasion), the Inquisition (a Catholic thing, not us Protestants), slavery (abolished thanks to Christians), and Jim Crow (Dr. King also had a “Reverend” in front of his name).
Despite the interpretations and defenses of the President on what he meant, he gave away the game with a bit of the speech not given nearly as much play in the media.  From the transcript:
I believe that the starting point of faith is some doubt — not being so full of yourself and so confident that you are right and that God speaks only to us, and doesn’t speak to others, that God only cares about us and doesn’t care about others, that somehow we alone are in possession of the truth.
Christ said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.” (John 14:6) Christ himself is truth. When we possess Christ, we possess truth. The President is a moral relativist. It was clear in his whole speech. He cannot condemn and attack ISIS as he should because in his mind what is truth? Truth is a nebulous concept with our post-modern President. With truth a nebulous concept, right and wrong are too.
We know God cares about everyone. We know Christ came to die for sinners. But Christians know Christ is truth itself. To have truth, we must have Christ. To suggest that everyone can have some version of God and some version of truth is worldly babbling, not Christianity.
The President followed up those words with these:
And so, as people of faith, we are summoned to push back against those who try to distort our religion — any religion — for their own nihilistic ends. 
I agree.
So I wish the President would stop professing himself to be a Christian if he is not going to proclaim Christ as truth and the only way to salvation. The “all paths” nonsense and moral equivalence might fit in with the present age, but the present age does not really fit with Christ.
And as for doubts on whether I’m right, “the starting point of faith is some doubt” in my ability to save myself, not in whether I’m right. I know I’m a sinner. I know I cannot save myself. I have no doubt that Christ is the only way. It’s not that I’m right, but that Christ is right. So, Mr. President, get off your own high horse.
Credit to Redstate.com

Italian Northern League Party Calls NATO’s Expansion Madness




Matteo Salvini, who heads Italy's Northern League party, called NATO’s decision to establish additional command centers in six European countries madness, adding that war is not a game.

Matteo Salvini, who heads Italy's Northern League party, called NATO’s decision to establish additional command centers in six European countries madness.
organizza forza da schierare ai confini con . Altra FOLLIA dopo sanzioni economiche: non si gioca alla GUERRA!
"NATO deploys forces on the border with Russia. Another madness after economic sanctions: war is not a game," he tweeted.


Russia to Give ‘Adequate’ Response to NATO’s Expansion

On Thursday, the defense ministers of NATO member-states agreed to set up six new command and control centers in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania and more than double the size of its response force from 13,000 to 30,000.

NATO's growing presence in Eastern Europe has been the subject of geopolitical tensions, with Russia having expressed growing concern over the buildup of NATO forces along its western border.

NATO, which has accused Russia of being involved in the Ukrainian crisis, claims that the expansion is aimed at protecting its member-states and allies.



Read more: http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150206/1017877287.html#ixzz3QyRyOGET

Banking Industry: We Are At A Biometric Tipping Point

antichrist9
The San Antonio financial services company has rolled out facial recognition technology across its entire membership base that lets them access its mobile app with a tap of their smartphone camera and a blink when prompted (to prove they’re a live person and not a photo). USAA is also giving members the option of logging in with a spoken phrase. This makes USAA the first major U.S. financial institution to deploy a full-scale rollout of voice and facial recognition. In an industry that has tried and failed to make biometric identification work for 50 years, USAA’s efforts could be a significant turning point. One key reason why is the immense popularity of the smartphone. Smartphone cameras let users employ their own hardware to capture their facial characteristics. Device identity also provides assurance that the smartphone belongs to the right customer. Credit to Skywatch.
USAA is letting its members log in to mobile banking in the blink of an eye — literally.

The San Antonio financial services company has rolled out facial recognition technology across its entire membership base that lets them access its mobile app with a tap of their smartphone camera and a blink when prompted (to prove they're a live person and not a photo). USAA is also giving members the option of logging in with a spoken phrase.

This makes USAA the first major U.S. financial institution to deploy a full-scale rollout of voice and facial recognition. In an industry that has tried and failed to make biometric identification work for 50 years, USAA's efforts could be a significant turning point.

One key reason why is the immense popularity of the smartphone. Smartphone cameras let users employ their own hardware to capture their facial characteristics. Device identity also provides assurance that the smartphone belongs to the right customer.

"The ubiquitous adoption of the smartphone has altered the market — you no longer need kiosks or readers, the smartphone is a multifactor edge device" for biometric authentication, said Tom Grissen, CEO of Daon, the Fairfax, Va. software company that developed the biometric technology with USAA (Daon is working on similar projects with several large banks).

Decades of improvements in voice and facial recognition are also helping reduce false negatives and friction — facial recognition takes two seconds. And a growing exasperation with forgotten, lost or stolen passwords may drive people toward face- or voice-based logins.

"Four out of five end customers who have experienced the technology prefer it over a PIN or password," Grissen said.

Adoption so far has been impressive: 101,000 USAA members are using the biometric options. (All told, USAA has 10.7 million members, four million of whom use its mobile app.) Even members over 50, of whom little adoption was expected, prefer biometrics over having to remember an 11-digit password.

Security in a Selfie

The use of facial recognition for authentication is rare in banking.

According to Rick Swenson, fraud operational excellence and strategic initiatives executive at USAA, the company chose facial recognition so it could deliver biometrics to the largest base of Android and iOS users possible — all smartphones have cameras that make face capture quick and easy.

"The advantage of face over voice in our construction is it takes two seconds or less to take that picture of your face," Swenson said. "Voice requires a certain amount of dialogue, usually around 20 or so seconds, in order to validate the signature of the voice."

Voice recognition is also heavily reliant on environmental factors like background noise.

"If I'm at a Spurs game, and I take out my mobile phone and try to use voice recognition, it's not going to work because I have 100 people around me screaming and yelling at the same time," Swenson noted. "What will work at a Spurs game is my face."

Facial recognition, Swenson said, is impervious to just about anything except bad lighting.

What's to prevent someone from logging in with someone else's picture or a video?

The key thing, and what may turn out to be USAA's secret sauce, is the company uses device identification in the background, so each time a member logs in, an encrypted token is sent from their phone to USAA that is matched against the ID of the device registered at enrollment. So for a fraudster to successfully impersonate a member with a photo or video (or trying to mimic their voice), they would also have to steal the member's mobile device.

The other safety mechanism is that USAA requires the member to blink, which rules out the use of a static photo.

"Face is much, much more secure than just user name and password," Swenson said, pointing out that in 2014 alone, more than 500 million user names and passwords were stolen and many are being used by fraudsters to break into financial services firms.

Security experts give USAA's approach high marks, especially for the facial recognition technology that watches the eye region of an image and looks for the user to blink.

"This means someone can't just hold up a good picture of you and have it match," said Kevin Bowyer, chair of the Department of Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Notre Dame. "And they can't even replay a video of your face and have it match, because the face image or the video of your face would not be able to blink at the right moment."

The combination of requiring the right device, a face match and a blink at the right time should prove to be far more accurate and secure than a password, thumbprint or other single fingerprint, Bowyer said.




Credit to Americanbanker.com

Dead Bankers Hold the Key to the Coming Civil War


killing bankers

Last year, 48 prominent bankers died in the most interesting case of coincidental deaths or one of the most daring plots against the elite in modern history. In THEmost amazing of these assassinations, 57-year-old Richard Talley was found “with eight nail gun wounds to his torso and head” in his own garage. How could any human being accomplish doing this to themselves? This scenario has repeated itself 48 times in the past year.
This article explores the various theories on who is to blame for dead bankers.

Are Bankers Killing Bankers to Prevent Prosecution?

Wall Street has been transformed into history’s biggest Mafia-type casino in the history of the world. The megabanks have become more reckless than ever, and trillions of dollars are at stake and corners have been cut and laws have been broken in order to maximize profits. One prominent theory on who is killing the bankers, centers on the elite level bankers, who are killing their underlings. Why? Because these banker minions could turn state’s evidence in exchange for immunity from prosecution at some future date. According to some, in the final analysis, there is really not that much difference between how organized crime operates operate and how Wall Street carries out its business.
Those that believe that the bankers are killing their own to prevent future prosecutions, make a great deal of sense. However, they would be wrong! The bankers, who have effectively hijacked our government do not need protection from the very government in which they control virtually every aspect of power.
The bankers have, time and time again, committed egregious offenses against the American people and nobody goes to mail. Dyncorps and Wells Fargo Wachovia have been busted for child sex trafficking, paid a $400 million dollar fine, but nobody went to jail. MF Global stole over a billion dollars in secured investor accounts and nobody went to jail. The bail-outs were necessitated because Wall Street participated in the illegal ponzi scheme called “credit-swap derivatives”, and nobody went to jail. The MERS mortgage fraud has cheated millions out of maintaining ownership of their homes, hundreds of district attorneys are aware of this fact, and nobody has gone to jail. Goldman Sachs shorted stocks related to the airlines just prior to 9/11. They did the same with the Gulf Oil Explosion. And most recently, the thieves from Goldman Sachs shorted the price of gold and caused a massive dump of gold in April of 2013, just prior to the elite grabbing as much gold as they could as a hedge against the coming economic collapse. Also, don’t forget that for over a 100 years, the Federal Reserve has created counterfeit money out of thin air through fractional reserve banking and nobody has even been charged for an offense that would send the average American to prison for 20 years. The bankers are not killing each other to prevent prosecution from a system that they already control.

Is Putin Killing the Bankers?

One theory that is floating out there with regard to the assassinations of these bankers has to do with Putin masterminding a giant plot to kill Western bankers in retaliation for their influence in inhibiting the Russian flow of gas through Ukraine to Europe. Further, this same line of thinking postulates that Putin is also killing the bankers because of plunging oil prices, which is devastating the Russian economy as well as S&P lowering the credit rating of the Russian government.
This theory fails on its face because if Putin was carrying  OUTthese murders, he knows he is inviting World War III. And if he was going to invite World War III, why not just start World III on his terms at a time of his choosing in order to maximize his chances of winning. Clearly, Putin is not killing the bankers.

Another Disgruntled Set of Groups Who Have Motive to Kill Bankers

There is a common thread which runs through the Obama purge of 260+ senior military officers. The way that a senior command officer gets fired from the Obama controlled American military is to question leadership decisions. According to my sources, the most common leadership decisions that are questioned by members of the military have to do with worthless and expensive weapons systems which are serving to weaken the military in comparison to its potential foes, namely, China and Russia. These weapons systems are of course funded by the banking elite along with the loans underwritten by the megabanks.
Inferior Weapons System
Operating on the notion that the elite bankers want to destroy America in order to usher in world government, it becomes easy to see why the American military, military contractors, private armies and blackops are under attack. All aware people realize that Obama is the pawn of the bankers.
At the heart of Obama’s treasonous strategy to incrementally weaken the American military, the F-35 is at the heart of this dismantling of the American military as well as the destruction of the American military budget. The plane cannot climb and turn efficiently. It is a death trap for pilots who will be outmaneuvered by the faster and more efficient Russian and Chinese planes. The only winners in the F-35 controversy are Lockheed-Martin (the manufacturer of the F-35), the financial institutions underwriting the loans such as JP Morgan and the Chinese and Russian pilots that will shoot down these planes in the coming World War III. The military brass that dare to challenge one boondoggle after another (i.e. the expensive and inefficient F-22 which is now out of production), are shown the door. This systematic destruction of the American military extends to our nuclear weapons in which our launch policies have been compromised and a lack of budgeted maintenance money has been woefully decimated by Obama. Additionally, our suicidal rules of engagement in combat zones have also been a point of consternation among the military. The latter ultimately led to the sacking of three Afghanistan theater commanders.
In short, Obama’s policies have weakened the American military and destroyed the futures of many American military officers and he is doing so at the behest of the bankers.
Before we lay all of this at the feet of Obama, who does Obama work for? He works for the bankers who have hijacked our government.

Other Impacted Groups
Under Obama, our traditional covert and elite military forces have been assassinated (i.e. Seal Team Six) and much of the effectiveness of these units has been compromised.
Many in the military contracting business have experienced betrayals as well. Contracts have been shifted and work has been reallocated. Many of the military contractors now have chip on their shoulder. These groups have coalesced to form a type of Viet Cong resistance force.

Stunning Revelations

Two months ago, I began to receive intelligence information from my best sources which stated that the disaffected three groups mentioned in this article (i.e. blackops, some military contractors and much of the former military leadership) are conspiring to exact vengeance against a banking system viewed as an extreme threat to not only personal military careers but to the country as a whole.
I have sat on this story because there are not the traditional hypertext links which serve to prove a point beyond a reasonable doubt. However, I should mention that my best source was the same source that provided me with the “military coup angle” with regard to Benghazi. Although I was heavily criticized when I brought out the military’s intention to save Ambassador Stevens and use him as a pawn to expose the criminal actions of this administration and the bankers behind this Presidency, the story was proven to be true in a variety of ways.
I have had dozens of discussions with colleagues and associates on the fact that these three groups are behind the assassinations of the bankers. I have found a core of people, with affiliations to the media, whose confidential sources are all providing consistent data which validates what is being written here. In all, I have spoken to four media people who have very similar information to mine. Two of the sources are willing to go on the record with what they have been told and two sources asked that I not reveal their names.
The sources, willing to go on the record, which serve to validate these claims are talk show host Joshua Coy and Paul Martin, and of course, myself. The three of us are willing to stake our reputation on what is written here and are confident, as was the case with Benghazi, that more of these truths will surface. Besides printing the truth as we see it, this is also an attempt to shake the bushes.
If one is wondering what prompted me to lead the charge and shine the light of day upon this, is tied to recent events. I have been experiencing several recent communications anomalies which tells me that scrutiny has increased. Within the last week, I was speaking to my wife while driving and placed my phone on the passenger seat. After two minutes, the phone redialed my wife but displayed my number as “Unavailable”.  Emails between myself and my colleagues are being delayed by several hours, and there are a whole host of other anomalies which tells me that the surveillance is increasing. I believe, as do Paul and Joshua, that if one is going to be on the list, it is better to be on top of the list.  Breitbart, Hastings and Clancy all died with a major undisclosed  story inside of them. We have no such wish. Self-preservation is a powerful motivator.
One revelation that we have discovered is in regard to what is behind the recent Connecticut earthquakes. The “earthquakes” on their face are highly suspicious because they are thought by some to be to deep underground explosions which have been described as large booms. These facts are inconsistent with an earthquake in which the seismic activity would occur much farther underground. All three of us have been told that the earthquakes are actually deep underground explosions designed to take out some of the Continuity of Government bunkers that the elite will run to as circumstances dictate. If these attacks continue in other locations, the ability to cover this up will become increasingly difficult. The USGS is firing any scientists who calls the Connecticut anomalies anything but an earthquake.
jfk banker plot

Summary

Many readers, in the aftermath of Benghazi, have believed that the military would strike back at the bankers who are hijacking our government. Terrorist groups like to claim responsibility for the actions because they justify their existence as well as to attract more converts and potential funding. In the same vein, the people involved in this counter-insurgency want the American people to know that there is resistance to the takeover. This is the first step in gathering a popular resistance force.
My confidence call on this report being accurate is high because of the quality of sources from which the information comes from. I recently interviewed Josh Coy and compared notes with regard to what we know to be true. If you have not heard the interview with Josh Coy on this topic, you will want to listen to the following:

Audio Player
Audio Player

Clearly, the sides for civil war have been drawn and the killing of the bankers is at the heart of what is coming. My advice to all interested parties is to do your own research and satisfy yourself as to the threat level and then take appropriate defensive action.
Credit to Common Sense

US coalition against ISIS is fraying. Gulf Arab partners mull withdrawal over Iran’s involvement




The group of nations US President Barack Obama assembled last September for an air offence against ISIS inroads in Iraq and Syria is fraying. Wednesday, Feb. 4, US officials admitted that the United Arab Emirates had suspended its air attacks in early December, directly after a Jordanian bomber was downed over the Islamic State’s Syrian headquarters in Raqqa and its pilot Lt. Mu’ath al Kassasbeh was taken prisoner.

He was later burned alive by Islamic State executioners, as a video released this week revealed.
Although the UAE, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Bahrain joined the coalition from the start, most observers believe their participation was more symbolic than active. Iraq has no air force to speak of and its army turned tail against Islamic State forces; the Saudis allotted a trifling number of planes to the effort; while Bahrain doesn’t have an air force at all. The UAE has the biggest and most modern air force in the Gulf region and so its withdrawal is a major blow to Washington’s war effort, such as it is.

It is noteworthy that neither Washington nor Amman has disclosed the scope of Jordan’s aerial activity since the pilot was captured. 

The UAE dropped out more than a month ago, when it turned out after the Jordanian pilot’s capture that no personnel or facilities had been put in place to rescue air crews whose planes crashed behind enemy lines. The nearest US facility able to respond to this contingency is located in Kuwait, too far away to be able to reach downed air crews in time to save them from capture. This was and remains a source of major concern for all the air crews taking part in the coalition offensive.

The four Gulf Arab participants in the US-led group entertain profound reservations on another score: Iran’s increasing involvement in the US-led war on ISIS and the growing operational coordination between the two powers – especially in the Iraq arena – compared with Washington’s dwindling cooperation with the Gulf participants.
It is feared in Riyadh – and not just in Abu Dhabi – that the joint US-Iranian war effort against the Islamic State is providing a screen behind which the Obama administration is opening doors for Iran to advance its regional aspirations.
They are adamantly opposed to Obama’s policy in this regard and are loath to lend their air strength for its support. Therefore the entire Gulf component, and not just the UAE, may be quietly taking its leave of the US-led coalition against ISIS.




Credit to DEBKA file

UK: 25 MUSLIMS charged with sexual assaults against children under 16

TWENTY FIVE MUSLIM men have been charged with child sex offences in Calderdale following a major police operation.

untitled-1

Halifax Courier (via TROP The MUSLIM men, mainly from Halifax, have been charged with various offences including rape, trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation, sexual activity with a child under 16, sexual assault, voyeurism, sexual grooming, conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16, causing a child under 16 to engage in sexual activity without consent and supply of a Class B drug.

The MUSLIM men are: 

HEDAR ALI, 35, of Nantwich, Cheshire. He is charged with rape (x2) and trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation (x2)
FASIL MAHMOOD, 35, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 and supply of a class B Drug
ZAMEER ASIF, 24, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child
MOHAMMED RAMZAN, 34, of Bradford. He is charged with Conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16, rape and trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation.
KHALID ZAMAN, 37, of Bradford. He is charged with conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16, rape (x2) and supply of a class B drug
ATAF ALI, 32, of Bradford. He is charged with conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16 and voyeurism.
MOHAMMED FIAZ ASKAR, 32, of Bradford. He is charged with conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16
AESAN PERVEZ, 26, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual assault (x3)
MANSOOR AKHTAR, 23, of Huddersfield. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2) and the supply of a class B drug.
FURQAAN GHAFAR, 30, Derby. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16
AFTAB HUSSAIN, 35, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual grooming, sexual assault and sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2)
TALIB SADDIQ, 29, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2)
AMAAR ALI DITTA, 25, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2)
SIKANDER MALIK, 30, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16
AKBAR AZIZ HUSSAIN, 29, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 and supply of a class B drug
AZEEM SUBHANI, 23, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2)
TAHIR MAHMOOD, 42, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x3) and sexual assault
MOHAMMED AHMED, 41, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16
HAARIS AHMED, 31, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x3) and supply of a class B drug (x3)
TAUKEER BUTT, 29, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x4)
ARSHAD MAJID, 24, of Shipley. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16
CHRISTOPHER MULQUEEN-BENNETT, 36, of Newport (Gwent). He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.
MUHAMMED ASIM JANJUHA, 33, of Bradford. He is charged with rape.
HAIDER ALI, 39, of Halifax. He is charged with rape, sexual activity with a child under 16 and causing a child under 16 to engage in sexual activity without consent
SIKANDER ISHAQ, 30, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.
Credit to Barenakedislam.com

Islamic State Invites War, France-Germany Try to Avoid War

Your Car, House, Everything Will Know If You Are 666-Complaint In The Future… And People Are Finding That “Irresistible”




Last week, a man crash landed his drone on the White House lawn. Evidently, the individual, a member of a US intelligence agency, had been drinking and was showing off his drone to a friend when he lost control of the craft.





DJI Phantom drone with a GoPro camera.


Any other house and lawn and no problem. Obviously, not the case here. The president called for more drone regulations. Headlines fretted White House security. And DJI, the drone’s maker, grounded drones in the Washington DC area with a GPS software patch.

And perhaps that last item is the most intriguing. A maker of a physical product reached out through cyberspace and disabled it to comply with the law. (In fact, the update couldn’t be forced on owners as the drones aren’t internet connected, but if owners want to benefit from other updates, they have to accept that one.)

Now, it’s not to say DJI’s move doesn’t make sense. The fledgling drone industry is just getting its feet, and the FAA is still considering how to regulate it. Bad press about runaway drones in high-security areas? Not really all that ideal. Also, since 9/11, the airspace around Washington DC has been highly restricted. It’s not hard to see why the rule make sense in Washington. If a drone can carry a camera, it can carry more lethal packages and deliver them at a distance.

DJI had also already established a few thousand no-fly zones surrounding airports. Such no-fly zones are as much about safety as malevolent acts—mistakes happen, and we wouldn’t want a jet engine inhaling an errant toy aircraft.

But underneath all that is the fact that a simple software update can dramatically change what an already owned product can do. Most updates add functionality, but in this case an update took functionality away.

Where most regulated products rely on the threat of punishment and law enforcement to ensure people follow rules, with computer-based physical products, we may be witnessing the birth of a new, distinctly modern regulatory era.

Imagine a future in which the FAA rules on a particular item—say, no drones within 100 feet of federal buildings. Prior regulations have been put in place that require all drone makers to update their no-fly zones within five days. Almost instantly, no drone can fly within some new set of GPS coordinates. Why might this be appealing to regulators? In theory, the rule requires less enforcement because drones are physically prevented from flaunting it.


We’ve been talking drones, but they’re just one early example. There are others.




Tesla digital display.

Tesla, for example, is well-known for pushing automatic software updates to its cars. And these aren’t just updates to the dashboard readout. Elon Musk just announced a software tweak to improve the Tesla Model S P85D’s acceleration by 0.01 seconds—small but significant in the high-end market where accelerations are measured and compared in hundredths of seconds.

As we head toward an increasingly driverless future, cars will become more like computers on wheels than wheels with computers. What regulations could be written into software? Speed limits? No-drive zones? Car won’t start until you put on your seatbelt?

And, of course, it doesn’t end there either. Analysts expect billions of new physical devices to come online in the next decade. The Internet of Things may afford the government real-time regulatory enforcement—government mandated thermostat settings to save energy or restricted water usage in a drought, for example.

Could such a system be abused? No doubt about it.

Well-meaning regulations with unforeseen consequences are written regularly. Authoritarian regimes that already keep a tight grip on their countries' internet could, in the future, control much more. Further, regulatory software updates would likely only work for the law-abiding—those motivated to circumvent them will find a way.

But so it is with any technology. It’s trite but true—technology is a double-edged sword. The ability to wirelessly update a product may also extend its life and slow obsolescence. Your Tesla might get faster or smoother acceleration. Your drone may become a better flier in high winds or learn to do a flip off the palm of your hand.


Credit to singularity Hub